Skip to content

[Issue]: Changes to the technical product dossier supporting TASC #89

Description

@andy-yates-hdr

Issue Title

Changes to the technical product dossier supporting TASC

Issue Type

Process Improvement

Problem Statement

The TASC team worked on elaborating on questions we need to raise as part of the PDAP dossier. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1McYw7Py4SVASDpzj0b5HpoJg_-yT-FE7xf0QXEBekls/edit?tab=t.0

Note we decided that we need to ensure the dossier remains lightweight. It also works in conjunction with the overall other directives being generated as part of the workshop

ADR is critical to write

Scope Validation

Supporting PDAP v2

Proposed Solution(s)

ADR is critical to write. Tidy up the dossier format

Estimated Effort Level

Low (1-2 months, minimal resources)

Success Criteria

No response

How will this issue aid GA4GH harmonization?

Supporting PDAP v2

Additional context

Please provide any additional pieces of information you feel is relevant to this issue

Work Streams Raising This Issue

  • Clinical & Phenotypic Data (Clin/Pheno)
  • Cloud Work Stream
  • Data Security
  • Data Use & Researcher IDs (DURI)
  • Discovery
  • Genomic Knowledge Standards (GKS)
  • Large Scale Genomics (LSG)
  • Regulatory & Ethics (REWS)
  • Data Models & Schemas Committee (DaMaSC)
  • Genomic Implementation Forum (GIF)
  • Technical Team
  • Other (specify below)

Other Groups Raising This Issue

No response

Work Streams That Will Be Impacted

  • Clinical & Phenotypic Data (Clin/Pheno)
  • Cloud Work Stream
  • Data Security
  • Data Use & Researcher IDs (DURI)
  • Discovery
  • Genomic Knowledge Standards (GKS)
  • Large Scale Genomics (LSG)
  • Regulatory & Ethics (REWS)
  • Data Models & Schemas Committee (DaMaSC)
  • Genomic Implementation Forum (GIF)
  • Technical Team
  • Other (specify below)

Other Groups That Will Be Impacted

No response

Key Stakeholders to Consult

No response

Products affected

Please list them here. It does not need to be exhaustive

Additional Context

No response

Priority Level

Critical (blocking multiple work streams, immediate attention needed)

Additional Tags

  • Documentation
  • API
  • Schema
  • Security
  • Performance
  • Interoperability
  • Compliance
  • User Experience
  • Infrastructure
  • Testing

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions