Skip to content

feat: HCR081 withholds using-declaration fix when the stream escapes scope - #219

Open
georgepwall1991 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/iteration-22-hcr081-escape-parity
Open

georgepwall1991 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/iteration-22-hcr081-escape-parity

Conversation

@georgepwall1991

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Iteration 22. Parity with #218 (HCR060): guards all three HCR081 fix paths with VariableEscapesScope; no using-declaration fix when the stream is returned or stored into a member/container. Tests: new member-store no-fix test; return already covered by existing DoesNotReport_WhenStreamIsReturned. Local gates: format clean, HCR081 43/43, full suite 952/952. Review gate: codex CLI (expected usage-limited until Sep 12).

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
🔒 Security Review Completed 2026-09-07T17:12:25.518842Z 7b87d95 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

…scope

Parity with HCR060: no automatic using-declaration when the stream is
returned or stored into a member/container. Guards all three fix paths.
@georgepwall1991
georgepwall1991 force-pushed the codex/iteration-22-hcr081-escape-parity branch from 7b87d95 to 8ca7856 Compare September 7, 2026 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant