ci: add a 're-run CI' checkbox to the PR-summary bot comment - #97
Merged
Conversation
- pr-summary bot now renders a '- [ ] 🔄 Re-run CI' checkbox in its sticky comment. - new ci-retrigger workflow (issue_comment) re-runs the PR's latest link-check / awesome-lint runs when a maintainer ticks the box, then unticks it. Runs in base context (works for fork PRs), verifies the actor has write access, and never checks out or executes PR code — it only re-runs already-recorded runs.
📋 awesome-gno PR summaryNo list entries added or removed in this PR. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Answers "can the bot let us re-run CI from a checkbox?" — yes. This wires it up.
What changes
issue_comment(created/edited). When the box is ticked, it:link-checkandawesome-lintruns and re-runs them,Why this design
issue_commentruns in the base-branch context with the base token, so it works for fork PRs too (a plainpull_requestjob can't get write permissions from a fork).ifcondition no longer matches, so there's no loop.Use case
Exactly the gnockpit situation (#96): a link was red only because the target repo was temporarily private. Once it's public, a maintainer ticks the box and CI re-runs — no new commit or manual Actions navigation needed.