Repository navigation
fix(gax): remove node-fetch types and dependency #9785
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
aelmanaa
wants to merge
1
commit into
googleapis:main
Choose a base branch
from
aelmanaa:fix/gax-drop-node-fetch-types
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If
response.bodyisnull(which is possible according to theResponsetype definition, e.g., if the server returns an empty body or on certain network conditions), passing it directly topipelinewill cause a synchronousTypeErrorat runtime.To prevent this and ensure robust error handling, we should check if
response.bodyis present before callingpipeline. If it is missing, we can destroy thestreamArrayParserwith aGoogleError.References
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested this with a local HTTP server, on main and on this branch. The server-streaming call returned three responses: a 200 with a body, a 200 with an empty body, and a 204.
On Node, gaxios uses node-fetch, and
response.bodyis never null, including for the 204. The empty 200 and the 204 both end the stream cleanly. With a native-fetch Response, the kind Bun and browsers return, only the 204 has a null body. In that casepipelinethrows inside the.then, and the existing.catchreports the error as an UNAVAILABLEGoogleErroron the stream and on the callback. Nothing throws to the caller and nothing hangs.Main and this branch gave the same output. This PR only changes the type of
response, and the only difference in the compiled JavaScript is the added comment. So I'm leaving the PR as it is. The difference between node-fetch and native fetch for a 204 on a server stream already exists on main and can be handled in a separate change.