Repository navigation
xds: Prefer zero-length CIDR over unspecified prefix ranges - #13159
Open
hidingmyname wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
hidingmyname wants to merge 1 commit into
hidingmyname wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
An empty prefix_ranges (or source_prefix_ranges) list and a matching zero-length CIDR such as 0.0.0.0/0 both got a matching prefix length of 0, so FilterChainSelector kept both chains and select() could throw "Found more than one matching filter chains". Per gRFC A36 a CIDR with prefix_len 0 still matches an address family, so it is more specific than an unspecified CIDR. Score an empty CIDR list below any matching CIDR. Fixes grpc#13149
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #13149
An empty
prefix_rangeslist and a matching0.0.0.0/0both got a matching prefix length of 0, so both filter chains survived the prefix step andselect()threw "Found more than one matching filter chains". gRFC A36 says a CIDR withprefix_len0 is not the same as an unspecified one, because it still matches a network type, so the/0chain should win.This scores an empty CIDR list below any matching CIDR: no match is -2, unspecified is -1, and a matching CIDR is its prefix length. The same code handles
source_prefix_ranges, so that is fixed too.XdsListenerResourceis unchanged, since its uniqueness check already treats the two as different.Added
destPrefixRange_zeroLengthMoreSpecificThanUnspecifiedandsourcePrefixRange_zeroLengthMoreSpecificThanUnspecified. Both fail without the change.:grpc-xds:testpasses (4488 tests).