Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.14.1-alpine3.22 to 3.14.2-alpine3.22 - #38

Open
hashim21223445 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-eb017a8489009d24a3a94578745cd9bb
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.14.1-alpine3.22 to 3.14.2-alpine3.22#38
hashim21223445 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-eb017a8489009d24a3a94578745cd9bb

Conversation

@hashim21223445

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Dockerfile.autogpt

We recommend upgrading to python:3.14.2-alpine3.22, as this image has only 0 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
low severity CVE-2025-46394
SNYK-ALPINE322-BUSYBOX-14091698
  364  
low severity CVE-2025-46394
SNYK-ALPINE322-BUSYBOX-14091698
  364  
low severity CVE-2025-46394
SNYK-ALPINE322-BUSYBOX-14091698
  364  
low severity CVE-2024-58251
SNYK-ALPINE322-BUSYBOX-14091701
  364  
low severity CVE-2024-58251
SNYK-ALPINE322-BUSYBOX-14091701
  364  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@semanticdiff-com

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello @hashim21223445, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request proactively enhances the project's security by updating the Docker base image for the autogpt service. By moving to a newer, more secure Python Alpine image, it resolves existing low-severity vulnerabilities and ensures the application runs on a foundation with no known security flaws, contributing to a more robust and protected deployment environment.

Highlights

  • Base Image Upgrade: The Dockerfile.autogpt has been updated to use python:3.14.2-alpine3.22 as its base image, upgrading from python:3.14.1-alpine3.22.
  • Vulnerability Fixes: This upgrade addresses 2 identified low-severity vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-46394 and CVE-2024-58251) in the previous base image, as reported by Snyk.
  • Enhanced Security: The new python:3.14.2-alpine3.22 image is reported to have 0 known vulnerabilities, significantly improving the security of the Docker environment.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • Dockerfile.autogpt
    • Updated the FROM instruction to use python:3.14.2-alpine3.22 instead of python:3.14.1-alpine3.22.
Activity
  • This pull request was automatically generated by Snyk to propose a security upgrade.
  • The author, Snyk, recommends verifying application functionality after merging.
  • Snyk has provided links to view the latest project report, customize PR templates, adjust project settings, and read about Snyk's upgrade logic.
  • Interactive lessons on vulnerability fixing are also linked via Snyk Learn.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request from Snyk aims to upgrade the Python base image in the Dockerfile to address security vulnerabilities. However, the suggested image tag python:3.14.2-alpine3.22 appears to be invalid, as these Python and Alpine versions are not officially released. The referenced CVEs also appear to have future dates, which is unusual.

More importantly, there is a fundamental inconsistency in the Dockerfile: it uses apt-get (a Debian package manager) while referencing an alpine-named image. This will cause the build to fail regardless of the image tag.

I've added a critical comment to address the invalid image tag and the package manager mismatch, suggesting a valid Debian-based image that would be compatible with the existing commands.

Comment thread Dockerfile.autogpt

# Use an official Python base image from the Docker Hub
FROM python:3.14.1-alpine3.22 AS autogpt-base
FROM python:3.14.2-alpine3.22 AS autogpt-base

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The proposed base image python:3.14.2-alpine3.22 appears to be invalid, as official Python and Alpine versions do not match these numbers. This will likely cause the Docker build to fail.

Furthermore, there's a mismatch between the base image type suggested by the name (alpine) and the package manager used in subsequent steps (apt-get). Alpine Linux uses apk, not apt-get.

This suggests a fundamental issue with the Dockerfile. This automated Snyk PR might be based on a misconfiguration.

If the intention is to use a Debian-based image (to match the apt-get commands), you should use a corresponding valid image tag. For example:

FROM python:3.12-slim AS autogpt-base

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants