|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: "[Leetcode] 188. Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock IV explained" |
| 3 | +excerpt: "Leetcode daily challenge 2022 september 11th solution" |
| 4 | +header: |
| 5 | + overlay_image: /public/images/problem-solving-common-header.png |
| 6 | +tags: |
| 7 | + - Dynamic programming |
| 8 | +last_modified_at: 2022-09-11T01:24:08+09:00 |
| 9 | +--- |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +<a href="https://leetcode.com/"> |
| 12 | + <img src="/public/images/leetcode-logo.jpeg"/> |
| 13 | +</a> |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +## Problem |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +<a href="https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-iv/"> |
| 18 | + <img src="/public/images/leetcode-188.png"/> |
| 19 | +</a> |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +<br/> |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +## Key Idea |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +This is a typical dynamic programming problem. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +Before we get into main point, suppose we have unlimited chance of transaction (`k` $$= \infty$$. `k` $$= \frac{k}2$$ is large enough). |
| 28 | +Then, we may perform transaction whenever we discover price higher than yesterday, and that becomes our maximum profit. |
| 29 | +Please note the `quickSolve` method in solution. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +Now let's get into our main discussion. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +We define a recursive helper function `findMaxProfit`, which finds maximum profit with `k` transactions in interval `[0, endIdx]`, inclusive. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +```java |
| 36 | +private int findMaxProfit(final int[] prices, int endIdx, int k) { |
| 37 | + if (endIdx == -1 || k == 0) return 0; |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + int maxProfit= 0; |
| 40 | + for (int i=0; i < endIdx; ++i) { |
| 41 | + if (prices[i] < prices[endIdx]) { |
| 42 | + int spotProfit= prices[endIdx] - prices[i]; |
| 43 | + maxProfit= Math.max(maxProfit, findMaxProfit(prices, i-1, k-1) + spotProfit); |
| 44 | + } else { |
| 45 | + maxProfit= Math.max(maxProfit, findMaxProfit(prices, i, k)); |
| 46 | + } |
| 47 | + } |
| 48 | + return maxProfit; |
| 49 | +} |
| 50 | +``` |
| 51 | +<br/> |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +But that's not good enough. |
| 54 | +We compute `maxProfit` value over and over, which is known as overlapping subproblems in dp. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +Below is the optimal version of `findMaxProfit`, using `memoization`. |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +```java |
| 59 | +private int findMaxProfit(final int[] prices, int endIdx, int k) { |
| 60 | + if (endIdx == -1 || k == 0) return 0; |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | + if (cache[endIdx][k] != -1) return cache[endIdx][k]; |
| 63 | + cache[endIdx][k]= 0; |
| 64 | + for (int i=0; i < endIdx; ++i) { |
| 65 | + if (prices[i] < prices[endIdx]) { |
| 66 | + int spotProfit= prices[endIdx] - prices[i]; |
| 67 | + cache[endIdx][k]= Math.max(cache[endIdx][k], findMaxProfit(prices, i-1, k-1) + spotProfit); |
| 68 | + } else { |
| 69 | + cache[endIdx][k]= Math.max(cache[endIdx][k], findMaxProfit(prices, i, k)); |
| 70 | + } |
| 71 | + } |
| 72 | + return cache[endIdx][k]; |
| 73 | + } |
| 74 | +``` |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +We now can simply return `findMaxProfit(prices, n-1, k)`. |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +- Time: $$O(n^2)$$ |
| 79 | +- Space: $$O(n{\cdot}k)$$ |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +<br/> |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +## Implementation |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +<img src="/public/images/leetcode-188-result.png"/> |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +```java |
| 88 | +/** |
| 89 | + * author: jooncco |
| 90 | + * written: 2022. 9. 11. Tue. 02:04:14 [UTC+9] |
| 91 | + **/ |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +class Solution { |
| 94 | + private int n; |
| 95 | + private int[][] cache; |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | + public int maxProfit(int k, int[] prices) { |
| 98 | + n= prices.length; |
| 99 | + if (k >= n/2) return quickSolve(prices, k); |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | + cache= new int[n+1][k+1]; |
| 102 | + for (int[] row : cache) Arrays.fill(row, -1); |
| 103 | + return findMaxProfit(prices, n-1, k); |
| 104 | + } |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | + private int findMaxProfit(final int[] prices, int endIdx, int k) { |
| 107 | + if (endIdx == -1 || k == 0) return 0; |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | + if (cache[endIdx][k] != -1) return cache[endIdx][k]; |
| 110 | + cache[endIdx][k]= 0; |
| 111 | + for (int i=0; i < endIdx; ++i) { |
| 112 | + if (prices[i] < prices[endIdx]) { |
| 113 | + int spotProfit= prices[endIdx] - prices[i]; |
| 114 | + cache[endIdx][k]= Math.max(cache[endIdx][k], findMaxProfit(prices, i-1, k-1) + spotProfit); |
| 115 | + } else { |
| 116 | + cache[endIdx][k]= Math.max(cache[endIdx][k], findMaxProfit(prices, i, k)); |
| 117 | + } |
| 118 | + } |
| 119 | + return cache[endIdx][k]; |
| 120 | + } |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | + private int quickSolve(final int[] prices, int k) { |
| 123 | + int maxProfit= 0; |
| 124 | + for (int i=1; i < n; ++i) { |
| 125 | + if (prices[i] > prices[i-1]) maxProfit += prices[i] - prices[i-1]; |
| 126 | + } |
| 127 | + return maxProfit; |
| 128 | + } |
| 129 | +} |
| 130 | +``` |
0 commit comments