Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As we moved many components to monorepo (#4305 ) , the only component left is auroraboot and hadron that are sitting in separate repositories. While Hadron makes sense to have it separated (it is a LFS distro, with its own changes that are not tied to kairos, necessarily), Auroraboot instead is tied to Kairos, so it is a good candidate.
Describe the solution you'd like
Auroraboot as part of Kairos
Describe alternatives you've considered
Keep it in a separate repository.
Additional context
One of the motivation, is again, to be consistent and remove friction to consumers. They do not have to guess which version of AuroraBoot is compatible with which version of Kairos - if they are released alltogether and tested as a whole. Less confusion downstream, and even more easy for us to backport and do changes to a specific point in time.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As we moved many components to monorepo (#4305 ) , the only component left is auroraboot and hadron that are sitting in separate repositories. While Hadron makes sense to have it separated (it is a LFS distro, with its own changes that are not tied to kairos, necessarily), Auroraboot instead is tied to Kairos, so it is a good candidate.
Describe the solution you'd like
Auroraboot as part of Kairos
Describe alternatives you've considered
Keep it in a separate repository.
Additional context
One of the motivation, is again, to be consistent and remove friction to consumers. They do not have to guess which version of AuroraBoot is compatible with which version of Kairos - if they are released alltogether and tested as a whole. Less confusion downstream, and even more easy for us to backport and do changes to a specific point in time.