UPD: bump PolyhedralRelaxations compat to 0.3.6 - #501
Open
riehuntington wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose: Updates the PolyhedralRelaxations compat bound from v0.3.5 to v0.3.6. The v0.3.6 release updates PolyhedralRelaxations' ForwardDiff bound to a version compatible with the current MathOptInterface, which PMD needs in order to resolve alongside downstream packages that require the newer ForwardDiff/MOI.
Not breaking. This only changes a compat bound.
Changes: single-line change to [compat] in Project.toml, replacing PolyhedralRelaxations = "0.3.5" with PolyhedralRelaxations = "0.3.6". Plus a CHANGELOG.md entry. No source or test code is modified.
Testing: three tests fail locally: delta_gens.jl:44, en_opf_bounds.jl:6, en_opf_bounds.jl:50. I confirmed these fail identically on unmodified main in my environment (Windows, Julia 1.12), so they are pre-existing and not introduced by this change. The same three fail with both the old (0.3.5) and new (0.3.6) PolyhedralRelaxations. All other tests pass. The failures are solver termination-status assertions (ALMOST_LOCALLY_SOLVED vs LOCALLY_SOLVED, one LOCALLY_INFEASIBLE) and one tight current-magnitude isapprox, consistent with platform/solver sensitivity rather than a behavior change.