Skip to content

Bump ldk-node to latest main - #93

Merged
benthecarman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump-node
Jan 13, 2026
Merged

Bump ldk-node to latest main#93
benthecarman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump-node

Conversation

@joostjager

@joostjager joostjager commented Jan 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This aligns ldk-server with ldk-node's own approach of tracking upstream main rather than releases.

Update to ldk-node git rev d1bbf978 which requires passing NodeEntropy
explicitly to the builder. Also adds handling for new NodeError variants
HrnParsingFailed and InvalidScriptPubKey.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jan 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @benthecarman as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@tnull tnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not opposed, though I'll leave it to Ben to decide.

It might become more complicated if Server would ever want to take a dependency on rust-lightning or bitcoin-payment-instructions directly, though we probably don't want to do that but rather use LDK Node's crate re-exports anyways.

@benthecarman benthecarman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I don't imagine we will have any conflicts with deps, we should be able to get everything from ldk-node.

@benthecarman
benthecarman merged commit 6b8c6af into main Jan 13, 2026
14 checks passed
rsafier pushed a commit to rsafier/ldk-server that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants