Skip to content

Commit 914037d

Browse files
mpstatonclaude
andcommitted
new(context-v, issues): the crawl's search substrate is fixed to Anthropic web search — operator expected a choice
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UvYzx7vDWeafnkAi2nEQeb
1 parent 9b348d0 commit 914037d

1 file changed

Lines changed: 64 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

Lines changed: 64 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
1+
---
2+
title: "The crawl's search substrate is fixed to Anthropic web search — the operator expected to choose"
3+
lede: "The manual 🔍 has a provider palette (SearXNG free-first, Tavily, Exa, SerpAPI…); the didi crawl has no dial at all — one Claude turn with Anthropic's server-side web_search, per the crawl plan's Decision 1. The operator assumed the choice would carry over. It should at least be visible, and probably choosable."
4+
date_created: 2026-07-24
5+
date_modified: 2026-07-24
6+
authors:
7+
- Michael Staton
8+
augmented_with:
9+
- Claude Code on Claude Fable 5
10+
semantic_version: 0.0.0.1
11+
tags:
12+
- Issue
13+
- Augment-It
14+
- Didi-Crawl
15+
- Search-Providers
16+
- Prompt-Runner
17+
status: Open · Jotted
18+
---
19+
20+
# The crawl has no provider dial
21+
22+
## Current state (by decision, not accident)
23+
24+
`organization.crawl` = one model turn (CRAWL_MODEL, default
25+
claude-sonnet-4-6) with Anthropic's server-side `web_search` tool — the
26+
model composes and runs its own searches against Anthropic's backend. The
27+
connector registry (SearXNG/Tavily/Exa/SerpAPI/GDELT) never enters this
28+
path; it remains the manual 🔍's substrate with its palette. Per
29+
[[../plans/Didi-Crawl-Three-Targets-Relevance-Brief-And-Staged-Team-Ingest]]
30+
Decision 1, with the packs+Haiku pipeline named as the documented fallback
31+
substrate.
32+
33+
## The gap
34+
35+
1. **Invisibility:** nothing in the crawl UI says what's searching. The
36+
status bar should at least name the substrate ("didi crawl · Anthropic
37+
web search · sonnet-4-6") — the provider chip the manual flow already
38+
has, honestly filled in.
39+
2. **No choice:** the operator expected the palette to carry over. Lost
40+
with the fixed substrate: the free-first discipline (SearXNG costs
41+
nothing; Anthropic web search bills per search), per-provider strengths
42+
(Exa semantic, SerpAPI knowledge-graph), and comparability with manual
43+
results.
44+
45+
## Directions (jotted, in ascending ambition)
46+
47+
- **Name it** (trivial): surface substrate + model in the crawl bar and in
48+
the reply's `provider` field (already returns 'didi-crawl' — make it
49+
'didi-crawl · anthropic-web-search · <model>').
50+
- **Model dial** (cheap): expose CRAWL_MODEL choice per-crawl (sonnet vs
51+
haiku for cost, opus for hard orgs).
52+
- **Substrate dial** (the real ask): implement the plan's documented
53+
fallback — a connector-driven crawl mode (packs + Firecrawl + Haiku
54+
filter vs the brief) — and let the crawl bar choose between
55+
"Anthropic web search (agentic)" and "connector packs (registry)".
56+
This is where the palette returns.
57+
58+
## Open questions
59+
60+
- [ ] Does the substrate choice live per-crawl (a chip on the crawl bar) or
61+
per-workspace (a line in the relevance brief / a workspace setting)?
62+
- [ ] Cost visibility: Anthropic web search bills per search — should the
63+
crawl reply report how many searches it ran? (Pairs with
64+
[[Crawl-Progress-Is-A-Black-Box-Needs-Traces-The-Operator-Can-Watch]].)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)