Motivation for this fork instead of contributing to neo-ltex? #23
Answered
by
spitzerd
mxwell-dev
asked this question in
Q&A
|
Just wondering why ltex+ was founded when neo-ltex already seems to already continue development of the stale original extension? |
Answered by
spitzerd
Sep 1, 2024
Replies: 1 comment
|
Thank you for your valid question. The last meaningful commit on neo-ltex was on 6th February. This was almost 7 months ago. I don´t expect that you have to commit or answer to issues on a daily basis, but severe issues like neo-ltex/vscode-ltex#88 should be addressed in a few weeks. Even a comment on the issue would be fine, but ignoring the issue is not acceptable in my opinion. Sure, having three LTeX extensions in the VS Code Marketplace is confusing, but I don´t see any alternative. |
0 replies
Answer selected by
spitzerd
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thank you for your valid question. The last meaningful commit on neo-ltex was on 6th February. This was almost 7 months ago. I don´t expect that you have to commit or answer to issues on a daily basis, but severe issues like neo-ltex/vscode-ltex#88 should be addressed in a few weeks. Even a comment on the issue would be fine, but ignoring the issue is not acceptable in my opinion.
Sure, having three LTeX extensions in the VS Code Marketplace is confusing, but I don´t see any alternative.