Kinetic Gain Protocol Suite Fleet Dashboard v0.2. Single-file static HTML operator dashboard showing Suite-wide posture across all 11 vertical 6-packs = 66 sibling spec repos × 5 cross-cutting invariants + 10 AGPL-3.0 reference implementations (covering 10 of 11 verticals — RetailTech ref impl pending) × 2 horizontal composition tools. Built for AI-governance procurement teams operating across mixed regulated-vertical AI vendor portfolios. Dark-themed, no framework, no build step. GitHub Pages-deployable.
Part of the Kinetic Gain Protocol Suite. Companion to kg-suite-vertical-router + kg-suite-vertical-comparator.
Live at: https://mizcausevic-dev.github.io/kg-suite-fleet-dashboard/
| Section | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Hero | Live counters: 10 verticals, 6 canonical shapes, 66 sibling spec repos, 5 cross-cutting invariants, 10 reference implementations |
| Per-vertical posture cards | One card per vertical with tagline, canonical buyer, key design innovation, link to its mini-landing on suite.kineticgain.com |
| Cross-vertical posture by shape | Table showing all 60 sibling repos at a glance — every (vertical × shape) cell links to its actual repo |
| Cross-cutting invariant compliance matrix | 5-invariant × 10-vertical matrix showing how the same conceptual invariant is named / scoped / enforced per vertical |
| Reference implementations (AGPL-3.0) | One row per vertical with kind prefix, wall-clock pattern, and headline invariant — surfaces the 5 distinct wall-clock invariant patterns the Suite catalog supports |
| Horizontal composition tools | CLI cards for the router + comparator with one-liner usage examples |
Single source of truth: data/dashboard-data.json. Top-level sections:
summary— the count badges (vertical_count·shape_count·sibling_repo_count·cross_cutting_invariant_count·reference_implementation_count)verticals— the 10 verticals with code + name + tagline + canonical buyer + innovation pillshapes— the 6 canonical artifact shapesmatrix— 10 × 6 mapping of (vertical, shape) → sibling repo namecross_cutting_invariants+invariant_matrix— the 5 invariants × 10 verticals showing per-vertical scopingreference_implementations— one entry per vertical withrepo+ref_impl_kind_prefix+wall_clock_pattern+headline_invarianthorizontal_tools— the router + comparator entries
When a new vertical 6-pack lands, a sibling repo is renamed, or a ref impl ships, update this JSON and the dashboard re-renders.
# Run tests against the dashboard data
npm test
# Serve locally on http://localhost:8765
npm run serve
# Or just open index.html directly in a browser (fetch needs http://, not file://)CI workflow (.github/workflows/ci.yml) auto-deploys to GitHub Pages on every push to main. Live URL: https://mizcausevic-dev.github.io/kg-suite-fleet-dashboard/.
To deploy under a custom subdomain (e.g. fleet.kineticgain.com):
- Add a
CNAMEfile at repo root containing the subdomain - Add a CNAME DNS record pointing the subdomain at
mizcausevic-dev.github.io - Enable HTTPS in GitHub Pages settings
| Repo | Role |
|---|---|
| All 66 sibling spec repos across the 11 vertical 6-packs | The artifacts whose posture the dashboard reflects |
| All 10 AGPL-3.0 reference implementations (one per vertical) | The working code surfaced in the "Reference implementations" section |
kg-suite-vertical-router |
Featured tool: route any artifact to the right vertical-specific verification |
kg-suite-vertical-comparator |
Featured tool: generate cross-vertical comparison Markdown + JSON tables |
kinetic-gain-suite-landing |
Per-vertical mini-landings linked from each vertical card |
Deliberately minimal:
- No framework — vanilla JS only, ~150 lines in
assets/dashboard.js - No build step — the dashboard ships as static HTML/CSS/JS exactly as committed
- No external dependencies at runtime — single fetch of
data/dashboard-data.json, no CDN calls, no remote fonts - Strict CSP —
default-src 'self'blocks all third-party loading - Pure-Node test runner —
tests/dashboard.test.mjsvalidates data shape with no external test framework
This minimalism is intentional: the dashboard is meant to outlive any framework churn and remain trivially auditable by buyer-side security teams.
Suite-readiness scaffolding for cross-vertical AI-governance posture visualization. Useful for procurement teams operating across multiple regulated lines of business who need a single operational view of Suite spec coverage. Does not by itself establish compliance with any underlying statute or rule. The dashboard is descriptive (what specs exist + how they're shaped) not prescriptive (what regulators require). Per the standing public-language guardrail: readiness · evidence · posture · controls · scaffolding — never "compliant" or "attested" without an external attestation specific to each underlying regulatory regime.
MIT — see LICENSE.