Repository navigation
Scenario runner: the seed sets owner_id from scope values that are not person handles (service_desk owns public comments by the portal user) #30913
Description
domain:devx#2 · marchtian · session_017ihL2ebbZkr2QAEG1x7UC8
Filing gate: ① defect, named location. Out-of-scope finding of the dev work on #30882 (PR #30903), read from the cards in the repo, at origin/main 98f640d581. ⛔ Not a claim. Triage sets the grade and the lane.
Business reason. The scenario runner seeds each card's rows with a record owner (owner_id) taken from the personas' row scopes, so that the Run halves can check who sees what. On cards whose scope names something other than a person (an option value, a lookup to a group or a customer), the seed hands rows to the wrong user. The permission questions then grade an app against ownership the card never asked for, so a pass or a fail there says nothing about the app.
Where
packages/qa/scenarios/src/runner/prompts.ts:47:personaHandlesmaps every string value in a direct persona scope to that persona, whatever the field holds.packages/qa/scenarios/src/runner/orchestrate.ts:404and:413(line numbers at PR fix(scenarios): the seed loads a user-handle field with a user id, and both author loops run verify #30903's head):ownerFieldsis every direct scope field, and the seed loop setsbody.owner_idto that persona's user.prompts.ts:139: the build prompt's Row ownership line lists these values as handles, e.g.public=portal_customer.
Measured on service_desk
- 237 seeded
ticket_commentrows withvisibility = publicgetowner_id= theportal_customeruser, because that persona's scope rule isvisibility = public. - 15 seeded tickets name two personas through different scope fields. For example, t008 has
customer = cus_03(portal_customer) andgroup = grp_tech(team_lead), and t009 hascustomer(portal_customer) andassignee(support_agent). Whichever field the loop reads last setsowner_id.
PR #30903 does not change this. Its fix covers only the scope fields that hold a person handle and are neither a lookup nor a select (account.owner, invoice.owner, task.assignee across the nine cards).
Wanted
owner_id is set only from a field that holds a person handle. A scope on an option or on a lookup to a non-user leaves the row owner as the runner's default. A row that names two personas through two handle fields gets one owner by a rule the build prompt states. Pin it with the service_desk card.
Level: QA tooling only, Clause-②: no, Metadata-protocol: none.
Dedupe (open and closed): "personaHandles owner_id" (0 hits); "scenario seed owner_id service_desk" (only #30882, the sibling it came from). New.
Reader: the domain:devx lane seat, from pm:queue, after PR #30903 lands. The seed loop is in flight there.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 6, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: none
Triage: audit · p2 ·
domain:devx· 2026-11-06T10:55Z⛔ Not a claim.
owner_idfrom scope values that are not person handles. A runner defect from the first live runs (Scenario runner: the seed drops every owner-scoped row (handle left in the owner field; non-persona handles have no user), and the author loop never runs verify #30882). p2: it skews what a persona can see, so it skews grades.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 6, 2026
domain:devx#2 · marchtian · session_017ihL2ebbZkr2QAEG1x7UC8
Claim: PM loop round 1
Session:
session_017ihL2ebbZkr2QAEG1x7UC8Account:
marchtianBranch:
claude/issue-30913-seed-owner-id-handlesWorktree:
objectstack-issue-30913Domain:
domain:devxSeat:
domain:devx#2File surface:
packages/qa/scenarios/src/runner/orchestrate.ts: the seed'sowner_idmapping. It is set only from a field that holds a person handle. A scope on an option or on a lookup to a non-user leaves the runner's default owner. A row that names two personas through two handle fields gets one owner, by a stated rule.packages/qa/scenarios/src/runner/prompts.ts:personaHandlesand the build prompt's Row ownership line, which stop listing non-handle values such aspublic.packages/qa/scenarios/test/, pinned with theservice_deskcard.loader.tsorschema.tschange. Those belong to Scenario cards: declare which scope fields hold a person handle, and drop only the turns a refused seed row actually feeds #30914 and Scenario cards: an explicit origin marker (generic / customer-derived / held-out) and a zh+en title, so the gallery exporter can export anything #30932.Container & model:
S,mode:subagentClause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — QA tooling (the scenario runner); independent contract review before ACCEPT
Thread-read: none
Premise: holds. At
origin/main6ddf827236:personaHandles(prompts.ts:43-51) still maps every direct-scope string value to its persona.body.owner_idfrom it (orchestrate.ts:409,:413).Serial constraints cleared: open PR build(scenarios): a minimal unpublished build, and a narrow ./score entry that reads no objectql or plugin-sharing #30938 (@objectstack/scenarios ships .ts-only exports, so a consumer's built entry cannot load
./score(ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND) or must inline it; give it a minimal unpublished build step and a narrow scorer entry #30915, the scenarios build) touchespackage.json, the build config,src/score/, the READMEs andtest/build/; this card touches none of them.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 6, 2026
domain:devx#2 · marchtian · session_017ihL2ebbZkr2QAEG1x7UC8
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 30913, "status": "needs_decision", "branch": "claude/issue-30913-seed-owner-id-handles", "pr": null, "premise_still_valid": true, "change": "None. The order's stop condition fired before any edit: under the ordered rule (owner_id only from a userHandleFields field) the personas of six of the nine cards lose every row they own today, and on a private object owner_id is the only lever an owner-scoped build has for those rows. Measured from the cards at origin/main 6ddf827236 by replaying seedApp's owner loop (orchestrate.ts:398-420) over every seed row, with every persona given an account, and the loader's inScope rule (loader.ts:366-369) for what each persona should see.", "owner_rule": { "today": "orchestrate.ts:400: ownerFields is every direct (non-path) scope field of every persona, id included. For each row, in the row's key order, a string value that personaHandles (prompts.ts:43-51) maps to a persona sets owner_id to that persona's user; a userHandleFields field also sets owner_id (the persona's user, or the admin for an unheld handle). The last such key in the row wins.", "ordered": "owner_id only from a userHandleFields field (a direct scope field that is not id and not a declared lookup or select). Every other row carries no owner_id in the body, so the platform stamps the inserting caller: the admin user the runner signs in as (insertRow posts with the admin session, app.ts:216-218).", "two_persona_rule": "Under the ordered rule no card has two handle fields on one row: userHandleFields is account.owner (crm), invoice.owner (invoice), task.assignee (project), and empty on the other six. The 15 two-persona service_desk tickets involve no handle field (customer, group and assignee are all declared lookups). The rule would be: the first handle field in the card's declared scope order (persona order, then rule order) sets owner_id. Today it never triggers." }, "stop_condition_evidence": { "why_owner_id_is_the_only_lever": [ "The scorer's access-security.row-scope tag passes only an object that is private (owner-scoped) or controlled_by_parent (src/score/scenario-tags.ts:332-345).", "On a private object a member sees its own rows. RLS only narrows and cannot make a private row visible (content/docs/permissions/rls.mdx:105-113). viewAllRecords short-circuits business RLS (plugin-security security-plugin-rls-filter.ts:177-184), so viewAllRecords plus an RLS policy does not narrow.", "Sharing-rule recipients are user, team, position, unit_and_subordinates, business_unit, queue and field (packages/spec/src/security/sharing.zod.ts:137-145). The runner gives a persona one user and one permission-set grant and nothing else (app.ts createPersona), and the field recipient needs a user-typed field. None of these names the persona's runtime user from a lookup to an employee, agent, customer or group row.", "The one remaining route is readScope org plus a literal RLS in the persona's permission set (custodian == 'e06'). That app hard-codes a seed row id. A faithful app that models 'my assets' cannot write it, because no seed row links a user to employee e06." ], "rows_lost_under_the_ordered_rule": "Each persona below owns these rows today, all in its scope, and would own none: asset_lifecycle employee 14 (asset 4, checkout 7, repair_order 2, disposal_request 1), dept_manager 33 (asset 28, department 1, employee 4); leave_balances employee 12 (leave_request 10, leave_balance 2), dept_manager 4 (employee); order_to_cash sales_rep 22 (account 2, sales_order 20); requisition_to_receipt requester 10 (purchase_requisition), dept_manager 1 (department); travel_expense employee 22 (trip_request 12, expense_claim 10), dept_manager 1 (department); service_desk support_agent 15 (ticket), team_lead 82 (ticket 78, agent 4), portal_customer 46 in scope (ticket 5, customer 1, ticket_comment 40), plus 197 comments it owns today that are out of its scope.", "overlap_no_single_owner_can_serve": "The cards' scopes nest. Every row an employee, requester or sales_rep persona sees, its manager persona also sees: asset 4, checkout 7, repair_order 2, disposal_request 1; leave_request 10, leave_day 28, leave_balance 2, approval_step 10; account 2, sales_order 20, order_line 40, invoice 16, activity 14; purchase_requisition 10, approval_step 15, purchase_order 9, po_line 11, goods_receipt 10; trip_request 12, expense_claim 10, claim_line 20, approval_step 18. On service_desk, 15 tickets, 30 comments and 14 ratings are seen by portal_customer and by team_lead or support_agent. One owner_id per row serves one of the two. The other persona's visibility has to come from something the card does not provide today (a manager hierarchy, a position, a share). That is a card or ruling question, not a runner fix." }, "per_card_effect": { "crm_account_with_contacts": "unchanged: account.owner is a handle field; ac1, ac3 to the sdr user, ac2 (u_tia) to the admin, before and after.", "invoice_with_line_items": "unchanged: invoice.owner is a handle field; 2 invoices to the sales_rep user, before and after.", "project_with_tasks": "unchanged: task.assignee is a handle field; 3 tasks to the contractor user, before and after.", "asset_lifecycle": "would change: asset 32 rows (employee 4, dept_manager 28), checkout 7, repair_order 2, disposal_request 1 (employee), department dep_sales (id scope) and employee 4 rows (dept_manager), each from the persona's user to the admin. The old mapping is also wrong today: 4 assets in both scopes go to whichever key comes last (employee).", "leave_balances": "would change: leave_request 10, leave_balance 2 (employee) and employee 4 rows (dept_manager), from the persona's user to the admin.", "order_to_cash": "would change: account 2, sales_order 20 (sales_rep, a lookup to employee e03), from the sales_rep user to the admin.", "requisition_to_receipt": "would change: purchase_requisition 10 (requester) and department dep_sales (dept_manager, id scope), from the persona's user to the admin.", "travel_expense": "would change: trip_request 12, expense_claim 10 (employee) and department dep_sales (dept_manager, id scope), from the persona's user to the admin.", "service_desk": "would change: ticket 98 rows (support_agent 15, team_lead 78, portal_customer 5), ticket_comment 237 public rows, agent 4 rows (team_lead) and customer cus_03 (portal_customer, id scope), from the persona's user to the admin. The old mapping is wrong today on ticket_comment (197 of the 237 are outside portal_customer's scope: public comments on other customers' tickets) and on the 15 two-persona tickets (whichever key comes last). The 15 involve no handle field." }, "gates": "none run: no diff, so dispatch-gates --commands has no change set to derive from; node_modules was not installed because no gate needed it.", "files_changed": [], "deviations": [ "Stopped before the work at the order's stop condition (a persona whose visibility came only from owner_id on a non-handle value would lose its rows). No commit, no push, no PR, no merge of origin/main.", "The measurement is a scratch replay of seedApp's owner loop and the loader's inScope over the card JSON (plain node, outside the repo). It is not a test and is not committed." ], "open_questions": [ { "question": "How should a persona whose rows are named by a lookup to a person record (employee e06, agent a02), or to a group or customer, get those rows on a private object once owner_id stops coming from non-handle values?", "options": [ "A. Card change, declared: each persona names the seed row it is (for example a personas[].record naming employee e06 or agent a02). The runner treats a direct lookup to that row as the persona's handle for owner_id, and the build prompt says so. Option values, id scopes and lookups to non-person rows (customer, group) stop setting owner_id. Cost: a schema.ts and card change in the lane that owns the cards, then a small runner change here (one declared rule, not a heuristic). portal_customer and team_lead still need a second mechanism (next question).", "B. Implement the order as written (userHandleFields only) and tell the build to express every other scope as readScope org plus a literal RLS in the persona's permission set. Cost: small runner change. Six cards' personas lose every owned row in an owner-scoped build, and a passing build has to hard-code seed ids, so the row-scope grades stop saying anything about a faithful app.", "C. Runner only, card semantics: owner_id is the first persona (declared order) whose every scope rule on that object holds for the row (the loader's inScope). It fixes the 197 out-of-scope public comments (237 to 40) and decides the 15 tickets by a stated rule. It also gives managers rows on path-scoped objects, and the second persona of each overlapping row still sees nothing. Cost: small runner change; it contradicts the order's reuse-userHandleFields instruction, so it needs the seat's word." ], "recommendation": "A, because it is the only option where owner_id comes from a value the card itself declares as a person, which is what the issue's Wanted asks for, and the six cards' personas keep their own rows in an owner-scoped build. It needs the card lane first: schema.ts and the card JSON are outside this order." }, { "question": "The cards' scopes nest (every employee row is also its manager's; 15 tickets are both portal_customer's and team_lead's or support_agent's). What should give the second persona those rows, given one owner_id per row?", "options": [ "A. A card ruling that a manager-type persona's scope is expressed through a platform hierarchy the runner provisions (a position or business unit per persona, with a unit readScope), so the build can model it faithfully.", "B. Grade only the owning persona's view on overlapping rows, and mark the other persona's questions on those objects not measured." ], "recommendation": "A, because B takes most manager-persona questions out of grading on five cards." } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "carrier: the seat (card lane) · noted, not filed · On asset_lifecycle, leave_balances, requisition_to_receipt, travel_expense and order_to_cash, the manager persona's path-scoped rows (checkout, leave_day, approval_step, order_line, invoice, claim_line and others) get no owner from the seed today, before and after this card. In an owner-scoped build those personas already see none of them unless the object is controlled_by_parent. Same cause as the open questions · dedupe words: scenario manager persona path scope owner; seed owner_id nested persona scope; scenario row scope owner-scoped manager" ], "mcp_calls": "2: mcp__github__issue_read (get, get_comments) on this card; reads only, no write tool", "api_writes": "1: this comment, through scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=30913", "filed_issues": [], "security_findings": "none" }objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 6, 2026
domain:devx#2 · marchtian · session_017ihL2ebbZkr2QAEG1x7UC8
Parked · 2026-11-06T14:14Z ·
pm:dispatched→pm:on-hold. The card's Wanted, as filed, would break six cards. It needs a design ruling before any runner change.What the dev measured (report 6686876786; no code written, nothing pushed):
owner_idcame only from handle fields, six of nine cards lose every row their personas own:asset_lifecycle,leave_balances,order_to_cash,requisition_to_receipt,travel_expenseandservice_desk. For example, onservice_deskthe support_agent loses 15 tickets, team_lead 82 and portal_customer 46.owner_idis the only thing that gives a persona those rows. The scorer's row-scope check needs a private orcontrolled_by_parentobject, and no sharing rule can name a persona's runtime user through a lookup to an employee, agent, customer or group row.visibility = publiccomments fall outside portal_customer's scope.owner_idper row can never cover both personas.The questions (the seat filed this card on a premise that turned out to be half right):
personas[].record). The runner then treats a direct lookup to that row as the persona's handle, and option values, id scopes and customer or group lookups stop settingowner_id. This is theschema.tsand card surface of Scenario cards: declare which scope fields hold a person handle, and drop only the turns a refused seed row actually feeds #30914 and Scenario cards: an explicit origin marker (generic / customer-derived / held-out) and a zh+en title, so the gallery exporter can export anything #30932.readScope). The alternative, grading only the owner and marking the other persona's turns not measured, would drop most manager questions on five cards.Out-of-scope note: on the four HR cards and
order_to_cash, the seed today gives the manager persona's path-scoped rows (checkout, leave_day, approval_step, order_line, invoice, claim_line and others) no owner, with or without this card. The cause is the same as question 2.The card stays assigned to
domain:devx#2, and the slot is released. These are design questions for the scenario epic, so they go to the maintainer.Restart-when: the maintainer has ruled questions 1 and 2, and the card-format change for question 1 has landed or is folded into #30914/#30932.
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 7, 2026
domain:devx#2 · marchtian · session_017ihL2ebbZkr2QAEG1x7UC8
Ruling recorded · 2026-11-07T13:35Z · the maintainer answered 「同意」 at 2026-11-07T13:34Z to the recommendation in the project's analysis thread. The full analysis, which includes a platform survey, is in the project files at
issue-30913/decision-analysis.md. ⛔ Not a claim; the card stays withdomain:devx#2.Q1 = A′, persona ↔ person-record binding:
personas[].record = { object, id }. It is required for a persona with a scope, and the loader checks that it names a seed row.userfield. The build prompt requires auser-type field nameduseron that object.owner_id= the persona user only when it is that persona's record, or when a direct lookup on it points at that record. Option values and non-person lookups (department, group, customer) no longer setowner_id, so those rows keep the inserter (admin).run.personasorder wins, and the prompt says so. Onservice_deskthat gives support_agent the 15 two-persona tickets.userHandleFieldsroute, so both models coexist.Q2 = C: the second persona (department manager, team lead, portal customer) gets its rows through the build's own platform means: membership key + RLS, a
controlled_by_parentchain, or a redundant field. The runner only makes the binding real and explains it in the prompt, and grading is unchanged. The dev's hierarchy option does not work on the open-source runner: without the enterprise resolver,unitfails closed toown(plugin-sharing/src/sharing-plugin.ts:744-747).Where it lands, in order:
originmarker and{zh, en}title.personas[].record, since it is already the card-format declaration card. It touches the sameschema.ts,loader.tsand nine cards.personaHandlessplits into a handle map and a record binding, so callers such asprobeValueskeep their meaning.service_desk: the 197 out-of-scope public comments no longer go to portal_customer, the 15 tickets follow the persona order, and the dep_sales and cus_03 rows land correctly.Restart-when: #30914 with
personas[].recordhas landed.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 8, 2026
domain:devx#3 · os-project-manager · session_01FEkQ5njkh3xbcDN6EtSfw7
Claim: PM loop round 1
Session:
session_01FEkQ5njkh3xbcDN6EtSfw7Account:
os-project-managerBranch:
claude/project-thread-zbvjqe(a project card thread,session_01FEkQ5mHhWW8Wwnm4Sn6oSV; the thread can push only its harness branch, a measured platform exception toclaude/issue-<n>-<slug>)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-30913Domain:
domain:devxSeat:
domain:devx#3File surface:
packages/qa/scenarios/**(seed owner loop, persona handle/record split, prompt Row ownership text, service_desk pin), onepatchchangeset.Container & model:
M,mode:thread,model: default — read dispatch-gates --tier on the real diff,effort: mediumClause-②: no — seed behaviour and prompt text inside published
@objectstack/scenarios, no new export; the thread reports a yes if its diff adds oneMetadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — internal tooling/test/docs defect, no user door
Thread-read: 6707625367
Premise: holds on main
7c523aa10. Restart-when is met: #30914 landedpersonas[].record(PR #31275). Taken over from devx#2 (offline); the ruling Q1=A′ / Q2=C in 6707625367 stands. Parallel with #31121 on the same package: merge on conflict.Ruling-ref: p2. Maintainer 「并发5」 (2026-11-07T23:53Z).
Order:
pm-orders/devx/order-30913.md(project files), handed to the card thread in its opening message.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 8, 2026
domain:devx#3 · os-project-manager · session_01FEkQ5mHhWW8Wwnm4Sn6oSV
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 30913,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/project-thread-zbvjqe",
"pr": "#31309",
"session": "session_01FEkQ5mHhWW8Wwnm4Sn6oSV",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Runner half of Q1=A′ / Q2=C (ruling 6707625367). The seed owns a row (owner_id) by a persona user only when the row IS that persona record, a declared direct lookup on it holds the record id, or a declared user-handle field holds the persona handle; the first persona in run.personas order wins, everything else keeps the admin. Each persona record row is loaded with that persona user id in its
userfield. personaHandles is now the handle map only, personaRecords the record binding, rowOwner shared by seed and prompt; the build prompt Row ownership section is rewritten with a platform-boundary line. On service_desk the portal customer owns 0 comments (was 237) and the team lead no ticket through group (was 78). Card assignee untouched (claim holds the identity).","head": "dba2b955",
"files_changed": [
".changeset/30913-scenario-seed-owner-by-person.md",
"docs/qa/scenarios/README.md",
"packages/qa/scenarios/README.md",
"packages/qa/scenarios/src/runner/orchestrate.ts",
"packages/qa/scenarios/src/runner/prompts.ts",
"packages/qa/scenarios/test/runner/orchestrate.test.ts",
"packages/qa/scenarios/test/runner/units.test.ts"
],
"line_budget": "+291 / -56 over 7 files (dispatch-gates --tier: 347 changed lines vs the 3000 human-merge threshold, under; no path-derived tier mandate)",
"tests": "At dba2b95: pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios build && pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios exec vitest run --maxWorkers=2 under the lock: Test Files 30/30, Tests 599/599, VERDICT command-exit 0 (after the scenarios... closure build, VERDICT command-exit 0). pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios typecheck (tsc --noEmit, includes test/**): exit 0. Scoped root lint (eslint packages/qa/scenarios --no-inline-config): exit 0. New pins: orchestrate.test.ts describe "seedApp — the service_desk seed owns a row only by a person it names" (5 cases) and 3 units.test.ts cases (handle map / record binding, rowOwner, Row ownership prompt section); one existing prompt pin moved with the rewritten text. Ablations via scripts/ablation-replace.mjs on committed HEAD dba2b95 (tests import src/, no dist leg): A1 rowOwner takes any direct scope value again (handle-field condition replaced by a marker), anchor 1 -> 0, blob 42b40208 -> a0c05041, 4 failed, restored blob == HEAD, git diff HEAD empty; A2 the record
userfield write deleted, anchor 1 -> 0, blob 79478b84 -> 9d74eee2, 1 failed, restored blob == HEAD, git diff HEAD empty. No live run (paused by the maintainer, cloud#3600) and no recorded-driver replay (no recording in this container).","gates": "Local, at dba2b95, exit captured before any pipe: node scripts/check-adr-0087-registration.mjs --base origin/main :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-adr-0087-registration.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-adr-links.mjs :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-adr-links.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-changeset-no-major.mjs --base origin/main :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-comment-mask-adoption.mjs :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-comment-mask-adoption.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-dts-emitted.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-empty-changeset.mjs --base origin/main :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-empty-changeset.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-issue-citations.mjs :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-plugin-teardown-shape.mjs :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-plugin-teardown-shape.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/ci/assert-turbo-remote-cache.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/ci/plan-test-core-shards.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/ci/prune-turbo-cache.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/ci/snapshot-next.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/docs-audit/check-affected-docs.mjs :: exit 0 | node scripts/docs-audit/check-drift-comment.mjs :: exit 0 | node scripts/pm/release-rehearsal-clone.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | node scripts/release-pending-publish.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 | pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions :: exit 0 | pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec run check:duration-unit-keys :: exit 0 | pnpm check:changeset-gate-self-tests :: exit 0 | pnpm check:ci-filter-parity :: exit 0 | pnpm check:cli-command-ids :: exit 0 | pnpm check:closed-ceremony-text :: exit 0 | pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs :: exit 0 | pnpm check:doc-authoring :: exit 0 | pnpm check:driver-memory-census :: exit 0 | pnpm check:dts-closure :: exit 0 | pnpm check:dual-build-cjs-loads :: exit 3 | pnpm check:engine-double-contract :: exit 0 | pnpm check:gitlink-declared :: exit 0 | pnpm check:issue-citations :: exit 0 | pnpm check:keyed-text-bounds :: exit 0 | pnpm check:lean-entry-closure :: exit 0 | pnpm check:logger-receiver-detach :: exit 0 | pnpm check:nul-bytes :: exit 0 | pnpm check:objectql-double-limit :: exit 0 | pnpm check:optional-error-sink :: exit 0 | pnpm check:org-identifier :: exit 0 | pnpm check:page-declaration-shape :: exit 0 | pnpm check:platform-object-tenancy-census :: exit 0 | pnpm check:published-files :: exit 0 | pnpm check:query-options-erasure :: exit 0 | pnpm check:refd-timer-probe :: exit 0 | pnpm check:registry-log-declared :: exit 0 | pnpm check:rest-log-spy-declared :: exit 0 | pnpm check:slot-lookup :: exit 0 | pnpm check:sourcemap-no-sources-content :: exit 0 | pnpm check:system-context-census :: exit 0 | pnpm check:test-source-alias :: exit 0 | pnpm check:tier-file-adoption :: exit 0 | pnpm check:type-check-coverage :: exit 0 | pnpm check:type-check-debt :: exit 0 | pnpm check:undeclared-dep-imports :: exit 0 | pnpm check:vouch-for-reference-callers :: exit 0 | pnpm check:watch-hint-literal :: exit 0 | pnpm check:where-matcher :: exit 0 | pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec run check:error-code-provenance :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-platform-checklist-watchdog.mjs :: exit 0 | node scripts/check-published-list-mirrors.mjs :: exit 0 | pnpm check:published-readme-exports :: exit 0 | pnpm check:changeset-fixed :: exit 0. dispatch-gates --ran: "63 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 62 run, 1 NOT-MEASURED (1 DERIVED from a recorded exit 3)". NOT MEASURED: pnpm check:dual-build-cjs-loads, exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (needs every package dist; only the scenarios closure built). check:type-check-debt re-measured under the lock 342 s, 0 raw tsc errors. Body-reading gates with the PR body as the event: check-changeset-no-major --event exit 0 (arm widening, protocol none, patch), check-partof-closing-keyword with PR_BODY exit 0, check-adr-0087-registration exit 0. CI families: read from PR #31309 check-runs, not re-run here (in_progress at report time).",
"dogfood_battery": "n/a — no
!in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm","deviations": [
"Clause-②: the claim says
nounless the diff adds an export; the diff adds personaRecords and rowOwner to ./runner (it re-exports prompts.ts), so the PR body and changeset declareyes (widening). personaHandles returns a smaller map on six cards (a changed answer, not a refused input or compile break), so no (narrowing) arm; named for the contract review.","Ruling item 4 says the 15 two-persona service_desk tickets go to support_agent; item 3 (a group is no person) decides first: 10 of them name only portal_customer (team_lead only through group), so 5 go to support_agent by persona order and 10 to portal_customer. Applied as written, both halves pinned (t008, t009), stated in the PR Acceptance notes.",
"PR opened with no labels: the order names none, and the relay refuses an empty labels list.",
"origin/main moved three commits after the gates (7fe019f, 007fdb1, 0f254f4), none in packages/qa/scenarios; not merged."
],
"mcp_calls": "4 — mcp__github__issue_read (get, get_comments) on #30913, mcp__github__pull_request_read (get) on PR #31275; reads only, no write tool. Plus one unauthenticated public REST read of #30913 comments (curl) to check the newest Claim while the MCP server was reconnecting.",
"api_writes": "2 — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (relay pr_create, fleet-write run 42430692611 -> PR #31309, body read back identical, no assignees), and this comment through scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=30913. Plus git push of the harness branch.",
"open_questions": [],
"security_findings": "none",
"out_of_scope_findings": []
}
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 8, 2026
domain:devx#3 · os-project-manager · session_01FEkQ5njkh3xbcDN6EtSfw7
Landed 2026-11-08T01:56Z · PR #31309 merged through the merge queue at 2026-11-08T01:55Z, as
eddc3ab53842209f8cba85c2ef788edf2a657d6a.merged: true, merge commiteddc3ab538, head revieweddba2b955eb(ACCEPT on the PR)Fixes #30913State change:
pm:dispatchedremoved. Onservice_deskthe ruling's "15 tickets" reads as 5 to support_agent and 10 to portal_customer under item 3, reconciled in contract review 6715311625.