Skip to content

Add documentation for laboratory service requests and their charge items - #158

Open
sonzsara wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
ENG-972
Open

Add documentation for laboratory service requests and their charge items#158
sonzsara wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
ENG-972

Conversation

@sonzsara

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Analytics SQL Review — Laboratory service requests mapped to charge items (SSMM)

Ticket: No linked ticket — JIRA lookup for ENG-972 returned HTTP 404/401 (see prep step). Branch name should resolve to a real ticket; without it I can't verify this query matches an actual requirement (metric, grain, facility scope). Continuing with Lenses 2–4.

Numbers — not yet trustworthy for the _ssmm dashboard:

  • Critical: No facility_id filter on either table despite the _ssmm suffix — this returns/aggregates across every facility, not just SSMM. That's a cross-tenant leak, not just an inefficiency.
  • High: emr_chargeitem.status (independent from the service request's status) isn't filtered — an entered_in_error/voided charge item will still appear as a valid mapping. Only the service request's status is checked.
  • Minor: deleted = FALSE is missing on both tables (low-signal since it's rarely set, but free and matches repo convention).

No join-fan-out risk here since there's no aggregate/money rollup, and the DISTINCT is reasonable given the intended 1-service-request-to-many-charge-items grain the Purpose describes.

Docs: Notes section correctly explains the lab-only filter; Parameters table is fine as-is (no params). Once the facility scope is added, document the facility id there too.

Hygiene: Correct domain folder (Care/Clinical/), filename convention followed, one file for one PR — no issues.

Verdict: Hold before publishing — the missing facility scope on a facility-suffixed query is the kind of bug that quietly leaks data across tenants on a shared dashboard.

Generated by Analytics SQL Reviewer for #158 · auto · 44.1 AIC · ⌖ 4.75 AIC · ⊞ 14.7K

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Analytics SQL Review — laboratory service requests with their charge items (SSMM)

This is a re-review triggered by a reply on my prior High-severity finding.

Fixed: emr_chargeitem.status != 'entered_in_error' has been added, closing the main gap (a voided/errored charge item no longer masquerades as a valid one). Confirmed at the current head SHA.

Still open on that same thread: neither emr_servicerequest nor emr_chargeitem filters deleted = FALSE. Low risk since the flag is rarely set in practice, but it's free and matches repo convention (see sibling _ssmm docs) — worth adding before merge. Left the thread open for this.

The facility-scoping thread was already resolved in an earlier round (SSMM is single-facility by convention, matching every other _ssmm query in the repo).

No new findings — the ticket link (JIRA 404 for ENG-972) and everything else already covered stands as previously reported.

Generated by Analytics SQL Reviewer for #158 · auto · 21.8 AIC · ⌖ 2.4 AIC · ⊞ 14.7K

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant