You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: ROADMAP.md
+1-3Lines changed: 1 addition & 3 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ unscheduled by default; a concrete use case is a legitimate reason to reprioriti
17
17
18
18
## Next up
19
19
20
-
The v0.11.0 release includes the credential-isolated broker pattern, promoted from a running
21
-
Hermes reviewer integration with real CI, lease, and restart-failure evidence.
22
-
23
20
Candidates for the next release, in priority order. Each names the evidence gate
24
21
it is still waiting on.
25
22
@@ -33,6 +30,7 @@ it is still waiting on.
33
30
34
31
| Version | Date | Theme |
35
32
|---|---|---|
33
+
|[v0.11.0](CHANGELOG.md#0110---2026-08-21)| 2026-08-21 | Credential-isolated broker pattern (TR-SEC-014), promoted from a running Hermes reviewer integration with real CI, lease, and restart-failure evidence |
36
34
|[v0.10.0](CHANGELOG.md#0100---2026-08-13)| 2026-08-13 | Announcement-ready README and roadmap, `AGENTS.starter.md`, rename to Agent Engineering Standards, `TECH-DEBT` tag, drift-guard tests for the README's own factual claims |
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/requirements-implementation-map.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ concrete artifacts. It is intentionally limited to public, reusable evidence.
21
21
| Memory/provenance hygiene | Source-tag at ingest, fail-closed trust derivation at read time, validated at retrieval, unverified/external content quarantined | Documented + registry + example |`AGENTS.md`, `registry/tr-registry.yaml` (TR-SEC-011), `examples/provenance-trust-tags/`|
22
22
| Strict LLM output-schema validation | Type and range checks on every model-returned field; reject, never coerce | Documented + registry + example |`AGENTS.md`, `registry/tr-registry.yaml` (TR-SEC-012), `examples/strict-output-schema/`|
23
23
| Compartmentalized multi-agent isolation | Two independent layers (tool-registry scope + data-layer scope) for agents sharing one backing service; a test proves layer 2 blocks a simulated layer-1 misconfiguration | Documented + registry + example |`AGENTS.md`, `registry/tr-registry.yaml` (TR-SEC-013), `examples/compartmentalized-agents/`|
24
-
| Credential-isolated broker operations | Scope- and revision-bound broker operations with single-use mutation leases and restart-safe read-only transport | Documented + registry + example |`registry/tr-registry.yaml` (TR-SEC-014), `examples/credential-isolated-broker/`|
24
+
| Credential-isolated broker operations | Scope- and revision-bound broker operations with single-use mutation leases and restart-safe read-only transport | Documented + registry + example |`AGENTS.md`, `registry/tr-registry.yaml` (TR-SEC-014), `examples/credential-isolated-broker/`|
25
25
| Ground-truth verification for agent security claims | An agent's self-report is not verification evidence for an isolation/permission/memory-scoping claim; verify against the enforcement point's own state | Documented + registry + template + example |`AGENTS.md`, `registry/tr-registry.yaml` (TR-TEST-007), `templates/completion-checklist.md`, `examples/compartmentalized-agents/`|
26
26
| Rollout sequencing (layering rule) | Foundational/shared infrastructure ships first; every later phase immediately usable on arrival, no phase idling behind an unmet dependency | Documented |`docs/ai-engineering-operating-model.md`|
27
27
| Design-time threat modeling | Trust boundaries, data classification, and ATT&CK/ATLAS technique mapping required for new listeners/credentials/tool grants/content sources | Template + example |`templates/threat-model.md`, `examples/worked-example/docs/decisions/ADR-004-example.md`|
0 commit comments