Refresh Goldman Sachs palindrome practice metadata - #152
Draft
tomtoto757 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Goldman Sachs palindrome entry still showed an older title and January 2024 date. This updates the existing listing to FastPrep’s published title, Palindrome Counter, and its latest valid sighting, Aug 29, 2026, while keeping the same public practice URL.
The row moves into the existing August 29 group without changing the relative order or content of any other question. README.md remains the authored source; formats/coding.md is the required output of the repository’s native generator, included to satisfy the current CONTRIBUTING.md workflow and keep the Coding page consistent.
Validation:
python3 scripts/refresh-freshness.pypasses and is idempotent (0 marker changes, 0 reordered positions on the second run).python3 scripts/sync-practice-formats.py --checkpasses against the current public catalogs.PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 -m unittest scripts/test_sync_practice_formats.pypasses all 11 tests.git diff --checkpasses. All 2,138 README rows and 1,807 Coding rows retain valid paired routes, unique company/route keys, descending dates, and stable tie ordering. The other 2,137 README rows, 1,806 Coding rows, and company list are unchanged.Independent regression review completed by a separate Codex reviewer who did not implement this change. Reviewed head:
e5a6c21a964ceeabdf90c9a47e8075b77d163973; latest target:9f924cc2d5f0ea0677993a523f09df6b1b9392d9(master, independently checked against the remote). The review covered the complete diff, CONTRIBUTING.md, native generator and hourly consumer, published title/company/route/date, duplicate and ordering preservation, rendered FastPrep metadata, and source-safe output. No findings; no fixes required. The reviewer independently reran the native check, all 11 unit tests, whitespace validation, and full table invariants. The native check’s 158 existing catalog-missing diagnostics are outside this diff;count-palindromesis not one of them. No outstanding regression concern was identified.No runtime code, problem content, or source images change. Type checking and application builds are not applicable to this static metadata update.