Skip to content

Switch to retentive outputs - #32

Open
mzueva wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mzueva/use-retentive-outputs
Open

Switch to retentive outputs#32
mzueva wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mzueva/use-retentive-outputs

Conversation

@mzueva

@mzueva mzueva commented Feb 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello @mzueva, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the output handling mechanism within the model by adopting a "retentive" approach. This modification aims to enhance the persistence or management of specific outputs, ensuring their availability across different contexts or stages of processing.

Highlights

  • Output Mechanism Update: The outputWithStatus method has been replaced with retentiveOutputWithStatus in the model/src/index.ts file, specifically for the 'pf' output. This change likely affects how outputs are managed and retained within the system.
  • Changelog Entry Added: A new changeset file, .changeset/silly-donuts-search.md, has been added to document the 'Switch to retentive outputs' change for the @platforma-open/milaboratories.vj-usage.model package.
Changelog
  • .changeset/silly-donuts-search.md
    • Added a new changeset file to document the 'Switch to retentive outputs' change for the @platforma-open/milaboratories.vj-usage.model package.
  • model/src/index.ts
    • Replaced the outputWithStatus method call with retentiveOutputWithStatus for the 'pf' output.
Activity
  • The pull request was created by mzueva.
  • No further review comments or activity have been recorded yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly switches the 'pf' output to be retentive by using retentiveOutputWithStatus. This is the proper way to handle an output that depends on its own previous value, as is the case here, and it likely resolves an infinite recursion issue. The change is concise and correct. The added changeset file is also properly formatted. I have no suggestions for improvement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant