Switch to retentive outputs - #32
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @mzueva, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the output handling mechanism within the model by adopting a "retentive" approach. This modification aims to enhance the persistence or management of specific outputs, ensuring their availability across different contexts or stages of processing. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly switches the 'pf' output to be retentive by using retentiveOutputWithStatus. This is the proper way to handle an output that depends on its own previous value, as is the case here, and it likely resolves an infinite recursion issue. The change is concise and correct. The added changeset file is also properly formatted. I have no suggestions for improvement.
No description provided.