docs: document confirmModulesPurge - #908
Conversation
|
|
Qodo reviews are paused for this user.Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more → On a Teams plan? Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center? |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Team Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe documentation links to ChangesNode-Modules settings documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR only documents the existing Suggested reviewers: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.) ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Confidence Score: 5/5The PR appears safe to merge. The previously reported documentation gap is fixed, and no blocking failure remains. Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs: clarify no-TTY purge behavior" | Re-trigger Greptile |
Summary
confirmModulesPurgecontrols confirmation before recreating incompatiblenode_modulesdirectoriesTesting
pnpm testRefs pnpm/pnpm#14316.
Written by an agent (Codex, GPT-5).
Summary by CodeRabbit
confirmModulesPurgeNode-Modules setting and linked to it from the settings overview.