Repository navigation
Abstract: separate provisioning from resolution - #32
Closed
remcovanmook wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
remcovanmook wants to merge 1 commit into
remcovanmook wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The abstract implied provisioning with "Hosts that receive...", leaving a reader to guess whether new DHCPv4 machinery is needed. State the two steps separately: provisioning happens through ordinary unmodified DHCPv4 or static configuration, and the sentinel value changes only the next-hop resolution step. Closes #30 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner
Author
|
Superseded by #42. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The abstract implied the provisioning step rather than stating it - "Hosts that receive
192.0.0.11/32as their IPv4 default gateway address resolve..." leaves the reader to work out whether new DHCPv4 machinery is involved.Now the two steps are separate and explicit:
From article review (H. Kramselund).
Closes #30
🤖 Generated with Claude Code