add zvabd draft spec - #381
Conversation
|
Andrew Waterman (@aswaterman) hi, could you please help to review this PR |
|
Renaming according to ARC review: https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-unprivileged/topic/arc_minutes_2025_11_18/116467687 |
Andrew Waterman (aswaterman)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add the missing newline at the end of the file.
done |
|
Qian Jiayan (@keyon1992) thank you! Qian Jiayan (@keyon1992) / Ved Shanbhogue (@ved-rivos) do either of you recall if the ARC assigned these particular opcodes? They seem reasonable at a glance. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #381 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 96.53% 97.08% +0.55%
==========================================
Files 10 14 +4
Lines 750 926 +176
==========================================
+ Hits 724 899 +175
- Misses 26 27 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
I think there are no vector fast tracks besides Sifve dot-products, so Zvabd/Zvzip opcodes should be reasonable. |
|
Andrew Waterman (@aswaterman) Sorry, I accidentally closed the PR just now. I have reopened it, could you please help restart the CI. |
b9f9bf9 to
a82447a
Compare
reference:
https://github.com/riscv/integer-vector-absolute-difference/releases/tag/v0.6