Skip to content

One new truffleruby advisory - #1264

Closed
jasnow wants to merge 1 commit into
rubysec:masterfrom
jasnow:truffleruby-adv
Closed

jasnow wants to merge 1 commit into
rubysec:masterfrom
jasnow:truffleruby-adv

Conversation

@jasnow

@jasnow jasnow commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One new truffleruby advisory

Also fixed spec for new rubies value.

@jasnow
jasnow requested review from flavorjones and simi October 15, 2026 20:46
@simi

simi commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm not sure this is actually truffleruby security issue, since it is documentation issue about non existent library. And the versioning also doesn't match the traditional entries. Probably worth to ignore.

@jasnow

jasnow commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@flavorjones - Do you agree with @simi?
Without a gem/library, someone could create one with malicious contents.

@flavorjones

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree we should ignore since it doesn't fit the structure of the db. I'm not sure why they even issued this CVE TBH since it would have been easier to just reserve the gem name?

@simi

simi commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can assign/attribute CVE to the non-existing gem :)

@jasnow

jasnow commented Oct 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Returning this advisory to the GHSA Unreviewed queue.

@jasnow jasnow closed this Oct 18, 2026
@jasnow
jasnow deleted the truffleruby-adv branch October 18, 2026 14:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants