[NEW TOOL]: Lyrebird

[rzhao-2]

Tool Name

Lyrebird

Repository URL

https://github.com/wwood/singlem

Website

https://wwood.github.io/singlem/Lyrebird

Primary Tool Category

Virus and Phage Identification

Description

Lyrebird is a module of SingleM specialized towards the profiling of viruses directly from metagenomic data. Currently, Lyrebird profiles dsDNA phages belonging to the Caudoviricetes.

Installation Methods

conda install -c bioconda singlem

Citation

No response

Additional Information

Programming language: Python

License: GPL-3.0 license

Submission Checklist

• I have verified this tool is relevant for virome analysis
• I have checked that this tool is not already in the list
• This tool has publicly available code or documentation

[github-actions]

Tool Validation Results

Thank you for contributing to awesome-virome! Our automatic validator has checked your submission.

❌ Validation Failed

Quality Score: 75/100

Good submission quality.

Errors

• ❌ Schema validation failed: 'nodes' is a required property

Warnings

• ⚠️ Citation doesn't match common formats (APA, MLA, BibTeX)

Suggestions for Improvement

• 💡 Consider using a standard citation format
• 💡 Based on description, also consider these categories: Virus and Phage Identification
• 💡 Adding 'license' information would improve the quality score
• 💡 Adding 'language' information would improve the quality score

Maintainer Checklist

• Review validation results
• Check tool relevance to virome analysis
• Verify tool is not a duplicate
• Confirm license allows inclusion

[github-actions]

Tool Validation Results

Thank you for contributing to awesome-virome! Our automatic validator has checked your submission.

❌ Validation Failed

Quality Score: 75/100

Good submission quality.

Errors

• ❌ Schema validation failed: 'nodes' is a required property

Warnings

• ⚠️ Citation doesn't match common formats (APA, MLA, BibTeX)

Suggestions for Improvement

• 💡 Consider using a standard citation format
• 💡 Adding 'license' information would improve the quality score
• 💡 Adding 'language' information would improve the quality score

Maintainer Checklist

• Review validation results
• Check tool relevance to virome analysis
• Verify tool is not a duplicate
• Confirm license allows inclusion

[github-actions]

Tool Validation Results

Thank you for contributing to awesome-virome! Our automatic validator has checked your submission.

❌ Validation Failed

Quality Score: 75/100

Good submission quality.

Errors

• ❌ Schema validation failed: 'nodes' is a required property

Warnings

• ⚠️ Citation doesn't match common formats (APA, MLA, BibTeX)

Suggestions for Improvement

• 💡 Consider using a standard citation format
• 💡 Adding 'license' information would improve the quality score
• 💡 Adding 'language' information would improve the quality score

Maintainer Checklist

• Review validation results
• Check tool relevance to virome analysis
• Verify tool is not a duplicate
• Confirm license allows inclusion

[github-actions]

Tool Validation Results

Thank you for contributing to awesome-virome! Our automatic validator has checked your submission.

❌ Validation Failed

Quality Score: 75/100

Good submission quality.

Errors

• ❌ Schema validation failed: 'nodes' is a required property

Warnings

• ⚠️ Citation doesn't match common formats (APA, MLA, BibTeX)

Suggestions for Improvement

• 💡 Consider using a standard citation format
• 💡 Adding 'license' information would improve the quality score
• 💡 Adding 'language' information would improve the quality score

Maintainer Checklist

• Review validation results
• Check tool relevance to virome analysis
• Verify tool is not a duplicate
• Confirm license allows inclusion

[github-actions]

Tool Validation Results

Thank you for contributing to awesome-virome! Our automatic validator has checked your submission.

❌ Validation Failed

Quality Score: 75/100

Good submission quality.

Errors

• ❌ Schema validation failed: 'nodes' is a required property

Warnings

• ⚠️ Citation doesn't match common formats (APA, MLA, BibTeX)

Suggestions for Improvement

• 💡 Consider using a standard citation format
• 💡 Adding 'license' information would improve the quality score
• 💡 Adding 'language' information would improve the quality score

Maintainer Checklist

• Review validation results
• Check tool relevance to virome analysis
• Verify tool is not a duplicate
• Confirm license allows inclusion

[github-actions]

Tool Validation Results

Thank you for contributing to awesome-virome! Our automatic validator has checked your submission.

❌ Validation Failed

Quality Score: 75/100

Good submission quality.

Errors

• ❌ Schema validation failed: 'nodes' is a required property

Warnings

• ⚠️ Citation doesn't match common formats (APA, MLA, BibTeX)

Suggestions for Improvement

• 💡 Consider using a standard citation format
• 💡 Adding 'license' information would improve the quality score
• 💡 Adding 'language' information would improve the quality score

Maintainer Checklist

• Review validation results
• Check tool relevance to virome analysis
• Verify tool is not a duplicate
• Confirm license allows inclusion

[rzhao-2]

@shandley

Hi Scott, thank you for this awesome resource!

I was wondering if you could clarify this error, it looks like I might be missing a field but the automated validator isn't clear on what I might be missing. Alternatively, would it be preferable for me to make a pull request instead?

Cheers,
Rossen