Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
|
its never not funny to me that my integration, targeting the local space, gets so many requests centered around cloud services 😅 someones made an issue requesting it as well I think but Ive been noping out at the wall-of-llm-generated-text each time I go to open it so far. not against the idea... I just hate reading AI walls-of-text |
|
Well, you simply made the best integration for OpenAI compatible endpoints. I also tend to ignore issues or PRs that are written like lengthy AI slop advertisements. 😵💫 I have to update my branch to your latest code before sending an PR, to check if there is anything that needs to be adopted. |
|
This is now released in https://github.com/skye-harris/hass_local_openai_llm/releases/tag/1.11.0 |

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi skye,
as a lot cloud providers use parameters in the base level of the request instead under chat template arguments,
I wanted to ask about your position to add a similar option entry here.
For example reasoning and similar options can't be set otherwise.
I currently built this as fork for myself here and I'm not sure if this is something worth to discuss to create a PR for ...
It already blocks keys reserved by the integration or that already have an UI setting in the options dialog.
https://github.com/Thyraz/hass_local_openai_llm/tree/request-cody-parameters
All reactions