Repository navigation
Ratify both 2026-08-19 amendments; pin digests - #10
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
R8's ratification sequence was skipped when PR #9 merged, so both amendments landed on main as DRAFT and unpinned. Executed here as its own commit rather than retrofitted into the merged PR. check_claims::check_ratified_amendments pins both digests and is mutation-tested in two directions: an edited file against an unchanged pin, and a revert to DRAFT with the digest re-pinned. NOTES.md carries two disclosures from the same pass: a cycle-4 fix reported done with a green build that never reached the file, and two tooling rules (no git checkout -- over unstaged work; never read $? after a pipe or command substitution).