Repository navigation
docs(efficacy): add the score.py rescore of thin hybrid to round 4's verdicts - #1956
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…verdicts With the key supplied, hybrid-1 and hybrid-3 read 0.82 to 1.00 on the security probes and 1.00 on data protection; hybrid-2 fails at boot on an undeclared dependency, as its registered reading did. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follows #1954 and closes no issue.
docs/audits/2026-10-17-round-4.md, in the hybrid section, now gives thescore.pyrescore of the three thin hybrid trees withTARIFF_SECRET_KEYsupplied. It includes the probes, which the direct re-run did not read. It also drops the matching "What is owed" item.AMBIGUITIES.md.braboj/tariff-runsunderrounds/2026-10-16-thin-sensitivity/score-py/(049b95b).r4-thin-scoring/security-scores: security probes 0.55 to 0.91, and data-protection probes at 1.00 only in full-3.No module named 'click'. Its registered reading was missing too.No CHANGELOG entry: this is a benchmark report.
run_smoke.pypasses 34/34.🤖 Generated with Claude Code