Repository navigation
Discharge_start_service - planning assumption #4785
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
thanks for your question. Predbat assumes the former, that the battery will discharge at the defined rate, anything needed for house load will be consumed first, and the remainder exported |
Predbat leaves all delivery of DNO export limits to the inverter. It will model what those limits are and any clipping in the plan, but it doesn't control the inverter discharge to prevent exceeding the DNO limit. What you describe sounds like a fault in the Alpha ESS inverter that would cause it to fail compliance testing. Maybe there is a tolerance allowed in the compliance standards that the inverter is allowed a period of time to ramp discharge back down if PV ramps up, I don't know. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Not sure if this is the right place to ask but....
When predbat decides to do a force export/discharge and triggers the discharge_start_service, does the planning assume that the battery continuously discharges at the mentioned rate, or does it assume that the battery alters the discharge rate continuously to achieve the mentioned rate of export?
The integration on my inverter can take either approach. Does it matter that much which one I choose.
As a follow up, if the planning assumption is that the battery discharge is constant, does the system take into account the DNO export limit if PV is still being generated - with some inverters, including mine, if you trigger a force constant discharge of the battery at your DNO export limit, and then the PV generation suddenly goes up a lot, you can be exporting higher than your official limit - this because the force_discharge modbus modes in e.g. Alpha ESS inverters don't respect the overall DNO export limit at the inverter side. If I use that mode it's up to me to manage within the export limit.
All reactions