docs: make resolver examples self-contained

[subham-hq]

Summary

This PR makes two resolver examples in docs/types/resolvers.md self-contained so they can be copied and executed independently.

Previously, the examples under:

• Let's define a resolver
• Defining resolvers as methods

relied on definitions introduced earlier on the page. Copying either snippet by itself resulted in a NameError because the required strawberry import and/or User type definition were missing.

Changes

This PR updates both examples to include:

• import strawberry
• the User Strawberry type used by the resolver

No resolver behavior or library code has been changed.

A RELEASE.md file is also included in accordance with the project's contribution guidelines.

Validation

The original snippets were first executed independently to reproduce the issue.

The failures were:

NameError: name 'User' is not defined

and:

NameError: name 'strawberry' is not defined

After updating the examples, both snippets were copied and executed independently with:

uv run python

and completed successfully with exit code 0.

The changed files were also validated with:

uv run pre-commit run --files docs/types/resolvers.md RELEASE.md
git diff --check

All applicable pre-commit checks passed, including:

• alex
• prettier
• trim trailing whitespace
• check for merge conflicts
• fix end of files
• blacken-docs

Scope

The change is intentionally limited to these two resolver examples rather than updating all documentation snippets at once.

This follows the incremental approach described in #1294, where individual documentation snippets can be updated in separate contributions.

Addresses #1294

Summary by Sourcery

Make resolver documentation examples self-contained for independent execution.

Enhancements:

• Make the two resolver documentation examples independently copyable and executable by including their required imports and type definitions.

Documentation:

• Update resolver documentation examples to be self-contained.

Chores:

• Add the required release note file.

[github-actions]

Thanks for adding the RELEASE.md file!

Below is the changelog that will be used for the release.

---

This release fixes resolver documentation examples so they can be copied and run independently.

The field resolver and method resolver examples now include the required
Strawberry import and User type definition.

This release was contributed by @subham-hq in #4581

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[greptile-apps]

Greptile Summary

This PR makes two resolver documentation examples independently executable and adds patch-release metadata.

• Adds the required strawberry import and local User type to the field-resolver example.
• Adds the same self-contained setup to the method-resolver example.
• Documents the change in RELEASE.md.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge with no actionable issues identified.

The changed examples resolve all referenced names within their respective code fences and remain consistent with established Strawberry resolver syntax.

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
docs/types/resolvers.md	Both updated examples now contain all required imports and type definitions, with no concrete issues identified.
RELEASE.md	Adds patch-release metadata that accurately describes the documentation-only change.

_{Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs: make resolver examples self-contai..." | Re-trigger Greptile}

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery assessment

Approved.

[bellini666]

This is a docs change only, it doesn't need a RELEASE.md file, so I removed it. Thanks for it 😊

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 34 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing subham-hq:docs/runnable-resolver-examples (2edc4e9) with main (f660894)}

[subham-hq]

Thanks for reviewing and merging this!

Appreciate the clarification on RELEASE.md, I’ll keep that in mind for future docs contributions.