Skip to content

Commit 6ba553f

Browse files
committed
Record active-task figure gallery update
1 parent cb86161 commit 6ba553f

1 file changed

Lines changed: 24 additions & 9 deletions

File tree

literature-refresh/submission_pack.md

Lines changed: 24 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
11
# Literature Refresh — Final Challenge Submission Pack
22

3-
- **Task:** compress the completed Q-GATE Atlas evidence into a reviewer-first challenge submission, three-minute demo, scorecard, and presentation narrative.
3+
- **Task:** compress the completed Q-GATE Atlas evidence into a reviewer-first challenge submission, three-minute demo, scorecard, presentation narrative, and an embedded active-task figure gallery.
44
- **Affected track:** project-wide submission framing; Liquidity Sentinel (`ACTIVE`) and Q-OPS C1.2 (`LOCKED_EVALUATED`).
5-
- **Search date:** 2026-08-01.
6-
- **Disciplines searched:** quantum optimization and trusted quantum computation; economics and market design; operations research and service staffing; Human–AI collaboration and governance; robotics and digital twins; challenge-specific workforce planning.
7-
- **Sources added or reviewed:** official Vanguard / WISER challenge brief; Q-GATE cross-disciplinary knowledge base; constrained-QAOA, stochastic scheduling, selective prediction, algorithm-selection, Human–AI governance, and trusted-computation references already registered in the repository.
8-
- **Most important support:** reviewers should see strong classical controls, selective quantum invocation, frozen held-out evidence, zero hard violations, and a manager-facing certificate before detailed circuit or sampling results.
9-
- **Most important challenge or warning:** the current prototype is a future-facing extension of the staffing use case and does not implement the full official queue-simulation scope, including average speed of answer and abandonment.
10-
- **Design change implied:** restructure the root README around a 60-second reviewer path; create a challenge scorecard, three-minute demo, final narrative, deck outline, AI-use disclosure, and final checklist; preserve the exact statevector-level claim boundary.
11-
- **Claim-boundary impact:** the submission should lead with a trusted selective hybrid advantage candidate on a frozen synthetic benchmark, never with real-QPU, wall-clock, asymptotic, production, or universal quantum-advantage language.
5+
- **Search date:** 2026-08-02.
6+
- **Disciplines searched:** quantum optimization and trusted quantum computation; economics and market design; operations research and service staffing; Human–AI collaboration and governance; robotics and digital twins; challenge-specific workforce planning; scientific visualization and evidence communication.
7+
- **Sources added or reviewed:** official Vanguard / WISER challenge brief; Q-GATE cross-disciplinary knowledge base; constrained-QAOA, stochastic scheduling, selective prediction, algorithm-selection, Human–AI governance, trusted-computation references, and the canonical locked figures and results already registered in the repository.
8+
- **Most important support:** reviewers should see strong classical controls, selective quantum invocation, frozen held-out evidence, zero hard violations, and a manager-facing certificate before detailed circuit or sampling results. A compact visual gallery improves discoverability when each image is clearly labeled as measured, conceptual, or audit-oriented.
9+
- **Most important challenge or warning:** attractive quantum-style figures can be misread as stronger evidence than the data support. The current prototype remains a future-facing extension of the staffing use case and does not implement the full official queue-simulation scope, including average speed of answer and abandonment.
10+
- **Design change implied:** structure the root README around a 60-second reviewer path; maintain the challenge scorecard, three-minute demo, final narrative, deck outline, AI-use disclosure, and final checklist; embed a clickable two-column gallery for the locked dashboard, circuit schematic, state distribution, state blooms, ambiguity map, and trusted certificate; preserve the exact statevector-level claim boundary.
11+
- **Claim-boundary impact:** the submission should lead with a trusted selective hybrid advantage candidate on a frozen synthetic benchmark, never with real-QPU, wall-clock, asymptotic, production, or universal quantum-advantage language. Conceptual circuit and state-bloom figures must remain labeled as presentation or schematic assets.
1212
- **Action classification:** `strengthens current direction` and `adds a new evidence gate`.
1313

1414
## Submission communication hierarchy
@@ -18,12 +18,27 @@
1818
3. Selective constrained-QAOA core.
1919
4. Classical feasibility and responsibility certificate.
2020
5. Frozen held-out results.
21-
6. Evidence boundary and remaining official-use-case gaps.
21+
6. Clickable visual gallery connecting method, evidence, and governance.
22+
7. Evidence boundary and remaining official-use-case gaps.
23+
24+
## Active-task gallery policy
25+
26+
The root README gallery uses repository-relative paths so images render inside the private repository. Each panel is clickable and opens the full SVG.
27+
28+
Gallery panels:
29+
30+
- constrained-QAOA circuit schematic — conceptual / architecture;
31+
- locked held-out dashboard — measured aggregate evidence;
32+
- feasible-subspace state distribution — measured representative-core result;
33+
- quantum-state blooms — conceptual / presentation;
34+
- classical ambiguity map — measured per-instance result;
35+
- trusted scheduling certificate — audit and evidence-boundary summary.
2236

2337
## Canonical submission assets
2438

2539
- `README.md`
2640
- `figures/submission/reviewer_journey.svg`
41+
- `figures/q_ops_global/c1_2_locked/`
2742
- `docs/DEMO_3_MINUTE_SCRIPT.md`
2843
- `docs/FINAL_SUBMISSION_NARRATIVE.md`
2944
- `docs/PRESENTATION_DECK_OUTLINE.md`

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)