|
1 | 1 | # Literature Refresh — Final Challenge Submission Pack |
2 | 2 |
|
3 | | -- **Task:** compress the completed Q-GATE Atlas evidence into a reviewer-first challenge submission, three-minute demo, scorecard, and presentation narrative. |
| 3 | +- **Task:** compress the completed Q-GATE Atlas evidence into a reviewer-first challenge submission, three-minute demo, scorecard, presentation narrative, and an embedded active-task figure gallery. |
4 | 4 | - **Affected track:** project-wide submission framing; Liquidity Sentinel (`ACTIVE`) and Q-OPS C1.2 (`LOCKED_EVALUATED`). |
5 | | -- **Search date:** 2026-08-01. |
6 | | -- **Disciplines searched:** quantum optimization and trusted quantum computation; economics and market design; operations research and service staffing; Human–AI collaboration and governance; robotics and digital twins; challenge-specific workforce planning. |
7 | | -- **Sources added or reviewed:** official Vanguard / WISER challenge brief; Q-GATE cross-disciplinary knowledge base; constrained-QAOA, stochastic scheduling, selective prediction, algorithm-selection, Human–AI governance, and trusted-computation references already registered in the repository. |
8 | | -- **Most important support:** reviewers should see strong classical controls, selective quantum invocation, frozen held-out evidence, zero hard violations, and a manager-facing certificate before detailed circuit or sampling results. |
9 | | -- **Most important challenge or warning:** the current prototype is a future-facing extension of the staffing use case and does not implement the full official queue-simulation scope, including average speed of answer and abandonment. |
10 | | -- **Design change implied:** restructure the root README around a 60-second reviewer path; create a challenge scorecard, three-minute demo, final narrative, deck outline, AI-use disclosure, and final checklist; preserve the exact statevector-level claim boundary. |
11 | | -- **Claim-boundary impact:** the submission should lead with a trusted selective hybrid advantage candidate on a frozen synthetic benchmark, never with real-QPU, wall-clock, asymptotic, production, or universal quantum-advantage language. |
| 5 | +- **Search date:** 2026-08-02. |
| 6 | +- **Disciplines searched:** quantum optimization and trusted quantum computation; economics and market design; operations research and service staffing; Human–AI collaboration and governance; robotics and digital twins; challenge-specific workforce planning; scientific visualization and evidence communication. |
| 7 | +- **Sources added or reviewed:** official Vanguard / WISER challenge brief; Q-GATE cross-disciplinary knowledge base; constrained-QAOA, stochastic scheduling, selective prediction, algorithm-selection, Human–AI governance, trusted-computation references, and the canonical locked figures and results already registered in the repository. |
| 8 | +- **Most important support:** reviewers should see strong classical controls, selective quantum invocation, frozen held-out evidence, zero hard violations, and a manager-facing certificate before detailed circuit or sampling results. A compact visual gallery improves discoverability when each image is clearly labeled as measured, conceptual, or audit-oriented. |
| 9 | +- **Most important challenge or warning:** attractive quantum-style figures can be misread as stronger evidence than the data support. The current prototype remains a future-facing extension of the staffing use case and does not implement the full official queue-simulation scope, including average speed of answer and abandonment. |
| 10 | +- **Design change implied:** structure the root README around a 60-second reviewer path; maintain the challenge scorecard, three-minute demo, final narrative, deck outline, AI-use disclosure, and final checklist; embed a clickable two-column gallery for the locked dashboard, circuit schematic, state distribution, state blooms, ambiguity map, and trusted certificate; preserve the exact statevector-level claim boundary. |
| 11 | +- **Claim-boundary impact:** the submission should lead with a trusted selective hybrid advantage candidate on a frozen synthetic benchmark, never with real-QPU, wall-clock, asymptotic, production, or universal quantum-advantage language. Conceptual circuit and state-bloom figures must remain labeled as presentation or schematic assets. |
12 | 12 | - **Action classification:** `strengthens current direction` and `adds a new evidence gate`. |
13 | 13 |
|
14 | 14 | ## Submission communication hierarchy |
|
18 | 18 | 3. Selective constrained-QAOA core. |
19 | 19 | 4. Classical feasibility and responsibility certificate. |
20 | 20 | 5. Frozen held-out results. |
21 | | -6. Evidence boundary and remaining official-use-case gaps. |
| 21 | +6. Clickable visual gallery connecting method, evidence, and governance. |
| 22 | +7. Evidence boundary and remaining official-use-case gaps. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +## Active-task gallery policy |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +The root README gallery uses repository-relative paths so images render inside the private repository. Each panel is clickable and opens the full SVG. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +Gallery panels: |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +- constrained-QAOA circuit schematic — conceptual / architecture; |
| 31 | +- locked held-out dashboard — measured aggregate evidence; |
| 32 | +- feasible-subspace state distribution — measured representative-core result; |
| 33 | +- quantum-state blooms — conceptual / presentation; |
| 34 | +- classical ambiguity map — measured per-instance result; |
| 35 | +- trusted scheduling certificate — audit and evidence-boundary summary. |
22 | 36 |
|
23 | 37 | ## Canonical submission assets |
24 | 38 |
|
25 | 39 | - `README.md` |
26 | 40 | - `figures/submission/reviewer_journey.svg` |
| 41 | +- `figures/q_ops_global/c1_2_locked/` |
27 | 42 | - `docs/DEMO_3_MINUTE_SCRIPT.md` |
28 | 43 | - `docs/FINAL_SUBMISSION_NARRATIVE.md` |
29 | 44 | - `docs/PRESENTATION_DECK_OUTLINE.md` |
|
0 commit comments