Fix owner-controlled production boundary - #6
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #5
Summary
Corrects a latent mismatch between the canonical human production boundary and its GitHub-native adapter.
The policy has always intended that:
The former adapter fields
required_human_reviewer: trueandprevent_self_review: trueaccidentally converted that intent into an unconditional two-human requirement. This patch explicitly permits manual owner authorization and promotion while allowing repositories with multiple authorized maintainers to configure a stronger reviewer gate.Changes
Validation
python -m pytest -q: 49 passedpython tests/verify.py: 19 acceptance checks passedgit diff --check: passedProduction boundary
This PR must be merged manually by the repository owner. Automation and agents must not merge it.