Skip to content

P3: Project metadata and timebase review/probe workflow #41

Description

@thunderdew-dawn

Source: Extension Ideas and API Consolidation review, 2026-06-08.

Classification: should implement cautiously.

Scope:

  • Add a project metadata/timebase review and safe planning workflow.
  • Read title/author/genre where available; probe whether setters exist before promising metadata writes.
  • Treat time signature and PPQ as high-impact settings requiring explicit user approval, readback, changelog, and rollback where supported.

Acceptance criteria:

  • Metadata setters remain probe-only unless documented and rollback-safe.
  • Time signature/PPQ plans clearly state project interpretation risk.
  • Any persistent write has scoped snapshot, readback, changelog, and rollback.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    api-dependentDepends on live FL API evidence or known API limitations.area:apiFL Studio API capability, limitation, or probe-related work.area:safetySafety contract, rollback, readback, audit, or verification work.github-source-of-truthTracked in GitHub as source of truth for generated Markdown snapshots.priority:p3Low priority or later.type:reportRead-only report, before/after summary, health view, or status output.write-safe-requiredAny persistent write must use snapshot, readback, changelog, and rollback.

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions