Skip to content

Docs: Organize Layout for CRM field groups (CRMAAS-3083) - #791

Open
haleyserrano wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
claude/epic-noether-8vndto
Open

Docs: Organize Layout for CRM field groups (CRMAAS-3083)#791
haleyserrano wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
claude/epic-noether-8vndto

Conversation

@haleyserrano

@haleyserrano haleyserrano commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JIRA

CRMAAS-3083 — Create the Organize Layout page

Classification

UI/UX change — new admin configuration page for arranging CRM field layout.

Repo targeted

Business App (end-user facing) — this feature is reached via Administration → CRM Objects inside Business App itself, alongside the existing custom fields manager.

Summary of documentation updates

Documented the new Organize Layout page in the existing CRM Objects admin article:

  • New "Organize field layout" section explaining how to open the page and what it lets you do (arrange fields into groups, set field order within a group, set sort order for unassigned fields, reset to default)
  • Added a bullet to the "What's included" list referencing the new capability

Existing docs updated vs. new docs created

Updated existing docs only — no new page created.

Placement reasoning

docusaurus/docs/business-app/administration/crm-objects/index.mdx is the existing article for the CRM Objects administration area (Contacts, Companies, Opportunities, custom objects, and their custom fields). Organize Layout is a new capability within that same admin area, so it was added as a new section there rather than a standalone page.

Acceptance criteria coverage

The ticket contains a single description line (no itemized acceptance criteria in JIRA): "Build the Organize Layout configuration page where admins arrange field groups, order fields, and set the unassigned sort order for a CRM object type, backed by the GetFieldLayout / UpsertFieldLayout / ResetFieldLayout APIs." All three user-facing capabilities described (arrange field groups, order fields, set unassigned sort order) are covered in the new section. Internal API/RPC names were intentionally omitted from the user-facing doc.

Figma / images

None were provided with this ticket. No screenshots were added — flagging this as a follow-up opportunity once the feature is available to add a screenshot.

Skills used

pre-push-validation (frontmatter, tag-closure, and gray-label checks passed on the modified file).

Assumptions / limitations

  • The parent epic (CRMAAS-3081, "Field Layout") is still in To Do status, even though this story and its sibling (CRMAAS-3082) are Done. The only other open sibling ticket (CRMAAS-3084) extends field layout into account templates — it's an additive feature, not a gating/eligibility/feature-flag ticket, and the epic has no Product-Roadmap label. Proceeding on that basis, but flagging the epic's incomplete status here per the rollout-check step.
  • Could not confidently identify the PR reviewer: no GitHub PRs are linked to this JIRA ticket, and this session's GitHub access doesn't extend to the code repo. Not tagging a code-author reviewer to avoid mis-tagging someone outside the org.
  • No source material (Figma, ticket detail) specifies the exact UI copy for buttons/labels beyond "Organize Layout" (from the ticket title) — wrote the navigation steps generically and consistent with this doc's existing style for the CRM Objects area.

@ahnikakuse @haleyserrano @maryam6samadi


Generated by Claude Code

Document the new Organize Layout page for arranging field groups,
ordering fields, and setting the unassigned sort order on Contact,
Company, and custom object records.
@haleyserrano
haleyserrano marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2026 21:56
Resolve conflict in crm-objects/index.mdx by keeping this PR's inline
Organize field layout section.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants