test: deepen provider authority scenarios (stack 1/12) - #349
Draft
vishaltandale00 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
test: deepen provider authority scenarios (stack 1/12)#349vishaltandale00 wants to merge 1 commit into
vishaltandale00 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 31, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack
1 of 12. Base:
main. This PR is the foundation of the test-depth reduction stack. Draft only; do not merge before the complete stack is presented.Scope and checkpoints
Test-only change. Production seams observed:
ProviderDefinitionService,ModelCatalogService, the Adapter registry, provider composition, and the real product app-server flow. No production behavior changes.This preserves the PRD boundaries for provider authentication and discovery, capability admission, atomic definition/credential/runtime/catalog lifecycle, zero-eligible connected state, refresh authorization/cancellation/shutdown, static imports, and packaging.
Reduction
The replacements use scenario matrices and aggregate completion while retaining distinct failure and authority boundaries.
Verification plan
npm run build.npm run check; preserve any unrelated failure explicitly.Verification actually run
npm run build: PASS.npm run check: repository gate remains RED only attest/provider-electron-evidence.test.mjs, timing out while waiting forsame-turn retry submission; 147 Vitest files and 1,782 tests passed, 1 file/1 test failed, 1 skipped. The same unrelated timeout was reproduced before this final snapshot.git diff --check: PASS.Adversarial review
Reviewer
/root/certify_pr1_provider; workspace diff SHA-256f12b4bb6da2f7bb6e25ec5d4c5b87070104f044e638fcca98bdf182311f3bff2; reviewed the seven-file provider authority/catalog portfolio, exact 108->62 replacement manifest, fixture isolation, aggregate completion, stable labels, hook semantics, and mutation-visible authority/failure boundaries; verdict APPROVE with no unresolved subsumption findings; focused portfolio 62/62 passing and portfolio LOC 2,989->2,802.Known gate
This draft does not claim a fully green repository check. The existing Electron evidence timeout remains visible for the stack review.