Name the softfp world vita_softfp, on a core that agrees - #14
Merged
Conversation
makepkg builds shell variable names out of CARCH, so nothing could be built for a world whose name has a hyphen in it -- see vitasdk/buildscripts#184 for what bash does with depends_vita-softfp. The core moves with the name: sdk-vita_softfp-snapshot-20260828.667.1 stamps CARCH="vita_softfp" in bin/makepkg.conf and names the same world in version_info.txt. Nothing was ever built against the old one.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Last of the three. vitasdk/buildscripts#184 has the diagnosis and vitasdk/autobuilds#47 is the same rename on the release side.
Short version: makepkg turns
CARCHinto shell variable names (depends_$CARCHand six more), so a hyphen made every build in this world die before it compiled anything — and on the way there bash silently appended the literal stringsoftfp[@]to all seven arrays, because it read${provides_vita-softfp[@]}as${provides_vita-...}.The core moves with the name. I checked the new one rather than trusting the validator, which only asserts the two stamps agree with each other:
Nothing was ever built against the old core — no package has ever been built in this world at all.
337 tests pass. The two
test_container.pyfailures are the pre-existing ones that need a real pacman and fail on master too.🤖 Generated with Claude Code