raw.json

{"summary":"The packet defines strong fail-closed execution, artifact, and verification contracts, but a Playwright provenance heuristic can promote ordinary JavaScript into gating E2E scope. Additional inconsistencies affect artifact race resistance, scanner read-scope disclosure, and taxonomy labeling.","scores":{"semantic_correctness":91,"false_positive_control":80,"security_trust_boundaries":88,"verification_design":93,"scope_contract_consistency":92,"docs_usability":91},"findings":[{"severity":"H","category":"false_positive_control","file":"skills/e2e-reviewer/scripts/scan.sh","line":593,"title":"Generic page destructuring proves Playwright scope","evidence":"The provenance helper treats any `async ({ page` signature as a Playwright runtime reference. In context, that result is accepted as framework provenance for gate-ready findings, although an ordinary callback can use the same destructuring without Playwright imports, fixture lineage, or types.","recommendation":"Require verified Playwright import, transitive fixture, or Page type lineage; retain bare destructuring matches as non-gating LLM-triage candidates."},{"severity":"M","category":"security_trust_boundaries","file":"skills/cypress-debugger/scripts/extract-junit-failures.py","line":168,"title":"JUnit reader omits post-read descriptor validation","evidence":"The report descriptor is closed after reading without comparing a post-read descriptor fingerprint or confirming the final size, unlike the packet's JSON artifact readers. A concurrent same-inode rewrite can therefore escape the documented stable-read boundary.","recommendation":"Before closing, re-run `fstat`, compare device, inode, mode, size, mtime and ctime with the initial metadata, and require the bytes read to equal the final size."},{"severity":"M","category":"security_trust_boundaries","file":"SECURITY.md","line":32,"title":"Security policy understates scanner read scope","evidence":"The policy says bundled checks inspect source beneath the requested root, while the included README and scanner implementation permit framework-provenance resolution to read relative imports elsewhere in the containing project.","recommendation":"State explicitly that findings remain scoped to the requested root but provenance resolution may read relative support or fixture modules elsewhere inside the containing project."},{"severity":"M","category":"semantic_correctness","file":"skills/e2e-reviewer/references/applying-fixes.md","line":22,"title":"Count assertion is mislabeled as pattern 15","evidence":"The canonical replacement table labels `expect(await x.count()).toBe(N)` as both `#4c-4e` and `#15`, while the included taxonomy states that the inner await resolves a value and therefore belongs to `#4c-4e`, not the floating-Promise `#15` contract.","recommendation":"Remove `#15` from this row and keep the shape exclusively under `#4c-4e`."}],"limitations":["No commands, tests, benchmarks, holdouts, network lookups, or repository history were used.","Runtime success and benchmark accuracy cannot be inferred from the included contracts and implementations.","The packet excludes portions of README.md, evaluation surfaces, and CI dependencies referenced by the included orchestration scripts."],"verdict":"FAIL"}